Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: chucknun
I think the longer it takes to decide the nominee the better, because it means both will have to keep spending more and more money while W. can sock it away.
4 posted on 02/19/2004 7:35:38 AM PST by TheBigB ("Flash, don't heckle the super-villain!" (John "Green Lantern" Stewart))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: TheBigB
A contested primary does not hurt the Democrats. It raises interest in their contest and gets the candidate on TV. Money spent on primaries will be more than made up for by the increased effectiveness in fundraising caused by the drama of the race. Plus a contested campaign helps the eventual nominee sharpen his message and define himself for the fall battle.

IMHO, the best thing that could happen for the Republicans is to have this thing settled early. Let the disappointed losers whine and cry about the front-loaded primary, and let Kerry drop from the radar screen for four months. By July, he'd be "John F Who?" at the convention.
18 posted on 02/19/2004 7:49:24 AM PST by bondjamesbond
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson