To: looscnnn
That is what this guy did, he carved his own niche by specializing in immigrants So you would not rail against him if he defended an immigrant who overstayed their visa. That and other things like that is what immigration law is all about.
82 posted on
02/19/2004 9:31:39 AM PST by
Dane
To: Dane
"So you would not rail against him if he defended an immigrant who overstayed their visa."
So what your saying is that if a person murders someone, they should not be defended. To answer your question, part of me would and part would not. He is asked to do a job and he does it. Haven't the courts stated that even illegals are also covered by the constitution? That would include being defended by a lawyer. If I knew this guy, I would tell him that I didn't like the fact that he was defending illegals.
"That and other things like that is what immigration law is all about."
Yes, exactly. Maybe you need to realize that yourself, as you evidently overlooked the "other things" that are involved in immigration law.
85 posted on
02/19/2004 9:39:54 AM PST by
looscnnn
(Tell me something, it's still "We the people", right? -- Megadeth (Peace Sells))
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson