Replies

The difference between, let’s say a Rush or Medved and Hannity, is with the former you come away with ideas and concepts, with the latter, just “throw-away” talking points.

I totally agree. I'll add too that's what frustrates the dems so much. They don't take the time or have the wit to process the consequences of their positions or actions. Hannity, on the other hand handles dems the way I do. Just beat them with a stick, repeatedly. Dems don't think, reason, or possess an intellectual property to allow them to debate with honesty.

I gave up years ago trying to reason with dem-lib types. When family, friends, co-workers go their lefty rants I just whack them, Hannity style. I may not change anyone's mind but I shut them the hell up in a fraction of the time without getting frustrated. The technique works.

Sean is necessary as just one more strong spoke in the wheel.

I guess Bluntpoint would prefer a more "nuanced" approach. I agree with Malkin, Hannity gets the the rat talking points and refutes them every day, in detail, and repeatedly. He's very popular and the "security" moms like him. I like it that he keeps his arguments simple enough to fit on a 3X5 cards because it keeps the rats from changing the subject. And Hannity isn't nearly as clueless when he gets off politics as Rush is.