Hannity vs. Evil: A one-man rally for America (Michelle Malkin)

National Review Online ^ | February 18, 2004 | Michelle Malkin

[Bluntpoint]

"What two gay guys?"

Funny!

Ya know, there are always going to be people who disagree here. But, to tell them to go away, or some other inane suggestion like go back to DU, is both intellectually lazy and corrupt.

Some here just one a board with mirrors and parrots.

[trebb]

Good arguments assume personal superiority?

[contessa machiaveli]

sean has a new book?

[moneyrunner]

OK. We get it. You don't like Hannity and you are his intellectual superior.

You are also a frustrated hick sitting on his ass in front of a computer while Hannity has an audience of millions and makes more money in a day than you do in a year.

Go back to shoveling sh*t. Living well is the best revenge.

[quantim]

The difference between, let’s say a Rush or Medved and Hannity, is with the former you come away with ideas and concepts, with the latter, just “throw-away” talking points.

I totally agree.  I'll add too that's what frustrates the dems so much.  They don't take the time or have the wit to process the consequences of their positions or actions.  Hannity, on the other hand handles dems the way I do.  Just beat them with a stick, repeatedly.  Dems don't think, reason, or possess an intellectual property to allow them to debate with honesty.

I gave up years ago trying to reason with dem-lib types.  When family, friends, co-workers go their lefty rants I just whack them, Hannity style.  I may not change anyone's mind but I shut them the hell up in a fraction of the time without getting frustrated.   The technique works.

Sean is necessary as just one more strong spoke in the wheel.

[kristinn]

As opposed to those who practice mental onanism with a keyboard and a mouse?

[smiley]

Absolutely on point....during Reagan's tenure as President, the Democrats were, once again, demonizing Reagan as ignorant, stupid and a 2-bit actor...BUT once Reagan (the hedgehog) forced Gorby to "tear down this wall"....Reagan made his place in history....Reagan was not afraid to take on the liberals and neither is President Bush...there are a lot of similarites between the two and both, no doubt, will go down in history....(unless, of course, the liberals (foxes) are rewriting it)...

[Bluntpoint]

Find a "ra ra" corner with your buddies. People that disagree with are not your enemies.

People whom afraid to tell you they disagree with you will always do you more harm.

[johnb838]

I guess Bluntpoint would prefer a more "nuanced" approach. I agree with Malkin, Hannity gets the the rat talking points and refutes them every day, in detail, and repeatedly. He's very popular and the "security" moms like him. I like it that he keeps his arguments simple enough to fit on a 3X5 cards because it keeps the rats from changing the subject. And Hannity isn't nearly as clueless when he gets off politics as Rush is.

[Bluntpoint]

Bingo. Nuanced and a more "critical" and thoughtful argument.

There are people who love this guy and there are those, like myself, who are embarrassed by him.

Both sides should be allowed to express such and then just sit back and enjoy the debate.

Debate is fun.

[Judith Anne]

Blunt point, I am receiving FReepmail about that photo you posted, and others are as outraged as I am.

Sorry if that's not "nuanced" enough for you.

[Bluntpoint]

I'm sure its not the first time you hit the abuse button.

I'm sure you live to be offended.

If you can't find offense looking out one window, you move to another window.

Then you get the binoculars out.

[kristinn]

Ya know, there are always going to be people who disagree here. But, to tell them to go away, or some other inane suggestion like go back to DU, is both intellectually lazy and corrupt.

Some here just one a board with mirrors and parrots.

41 posted on 02/19/2004 7:59:18 AM EST by Bluntpoint

Find a "ra ra" corner with your buddies....

48 posted on 02/19/2004 8:11:21 AM EST by Bluntpoint

Hello, mirror. Polly want a cracker?

[Bluntpoint]

And it was a fun debate.

Except for lemon suckers like yourself.

Do you ever tire of being the hall monitor?

[Judith Anne]

Yeah, ALL of us with binoculars don't have to look very far. Just find an article by Michelle Malkin, posted by nickcarraway, about Sean Hannity and you'll be all over it.

Incidently, you don't know how many people have hit the abuse button, do you?

And you can make any remarks you want to about me, the fact is, your behavior on this thread has been over the top and offensive, not to mention devoid of the "nuance" you seem to treasure, unless of course the photo you posted is what you are referring to. I can do without the homosexual "nuance on a Michelle Malkin thread about Sean Hannity's new book.

[Judith Anne]

You seem to be insulting everyone, Bluntpoint--me, Kristinn, others--as well as hijacking the thread.

[Bluntpoint]

Face it, anything is overtop for you if it is not in agreement with you.

You post what you post, I will post what I post and I will hit the abuse button zero times.

[Bluntpoint]

Insulting?

Give me a break. I commented on Hannity alone. It was others that started the personal nonsense. I just gave it back to them.

So spare me.

[Benrand]

I thought that picture was funny as hell in the context it was posted. Not everyday you see a flogging on the street. LOL.

Maybe Hannity could interview them on Man in the Street Thursday. "Who is the President?"

[Bluntpoint]

You really need to try to read it out of context to be offended by it.

But what the hey, I'm having a good morning, even though the coyotes got in my garbage last night.

Have a great day. I have to go back flush my radiator and take care of the horses.