Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: js1138
Perhaps I do not understand your seeming partitioning of miltary Veterans as a separate,distinctive, minority group of Republicans.
The wording of your post just struck me as very odd.
Struck me as relegating military Veterans to a special interest, sub-group category, not really full registered Republicans.
Are you a former Democrat?

129 posted on 02/18/2004 11:11:38 PM PST by sarasmom (Hanoi Jane admires John F*ing Kerry's military service in Vietnam=things that make you go hmmmm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies ]


To: sarasmom
Jeeze, what do I have to say? It would be political suicide for the republicans to initiate this as an issue. By that I mean Bush or members of the RNC. How is that not clear? I've said it twelve time in twelve different ways. What is the problem?

If you disagree with this analysis, just say so. Just say that bush should openly challenge Kerry's military record, or Rove should go on record demanding Kerry's military record.
130 posted on 02/18/2004 11:24:32 PM PST by js1138
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 129 | View Replies ]

To: sarasmom; js1138
You need to read his posts, again.

"Veterans acting on their own initiative are a credible political force."

He's right. Whatever demand for Kerry's records, and for an accounting of his medals, Viet Nam vets need to do it. He said nothing like...

"...relegating military Veterans to a special interest, sub-group category, not really full registered Republicans."

131 posted on 02/18/2004 11:26:28 PM PST by dixiechick2000 (President Bush is a mensch in cowboy boots.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 129 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson