Skip to comments.
Judge: No Nativity Scene Displays in NYC Schools
NY Newsday ^
| 02.18.04
Posted on 02/18/2004 4:26:26 PM PST by Coleus
Edited on 02/18/2004 4:32:41 PM PST by Admin Moderator.
[history]
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-29 last
To: 3catsanadog
If San Fran can ignore the law, so can NYers. F--- the judge and his ruling. Put up what you want. If it gets torn down, put it back up. And I hope it gives extreme migraines to those who claim "pain" and "anguish" over the "oppressive environment" caused by being within earshot of a Christian symbol they can't see. Buncha serious losers.
To: oceanview
The ruling is stupid. It makes no sense. Do Jews consider the Menorah a religous symbol? Do Muslims consider the Crescent and Star a religous symbol? If they're allowed in public schools than the Nativity should be allowed in public schools.
Having said that, it's time for people who are upset about rulings such as this one to bail out of the public schools altogether.
One of the many reasons my niece in CA was put into a Christian school was because of the hostility of her public school to Christian religious symbols -- even Christmas trees. The school had a very large Jewish population and permitted a Menorah in the vestibule, but no Christian symbols at Christmas.
Sometimes, it easier just to walk away.
22
posted on
02/19/2004 5:10:30 AM PST
by
ladylib
To: Coleus
Give em an inch and they take a mile. All this madness is based on a bad Supreme Court ruling in 1948, which itself was based on bad rulings regarding the 14th Amendment.
23
posted on
02/19/2004 6:07:12 AM PST
by
Imal
(I will never be a prophet.)
To: ladylib
The public is black mailed into staying in the government public schools. The government forces the public to pay taxes to finance the social engineering agenda in public school. That is the ONLY reason the government and the liberals are forcing public education on the American public.
If we were given choices to pay taxes and send our kids to be indoctrinated in the filth of public schools, or keep our money and send our kids to learn in private school, guess what public schools enrollment would shrink to a fraction of it is.
I have never heard of liberals screaming about that it is not fair for a poor kid to eat hot dog, and a rich kid to eat steak? There is no ACLU drive to tax the public, and then dispense food equally to their children! So, why is it feeding the children bodies is not as important as feeding their minds? The answer is; the ACLU is not interested in our children, only interested in brain washing them into the PARTY LINE!
To: Coleus
I wonder if displays of judges being hanged in effegy violate the first amendment . . .
To: Coleus
New York would be better off WITH NATIVITY SCENES and NO JUDGES ALLOWED!
To: ladylib
the Catholic League did ask the public schools to remove the other symbols (which is fine with me) before going to court, they refused.
To: 07055
Judge Sifton had ruled that upper body strength was largely "irrelevant" to firefighting.>>
Sounds like an a-hole too, liberal is an understatement.
28
posted on
02/19/2004 3:51:26 PM PST
by
Coleus
(Vote for Bush and Traditional Marriage; http://msnbc.msn.com/id/4205947/)
To: xJones
Menorahs are secular?
Maybe to New York judges they are, but not to Jews all over the world.
A Chanukah bush is secular.
29
posted on
02/19/2004 3:55:07 PM PST
by
Rome2000
(JIHADISTS FOR KERRY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-29 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson