[stylin_geek]

Incendiary as her first article was, I don't see where she lied in it. Brash and in your face, yes, but lies? No. What she said was correct, and certainly not the same as Paul Begala calling Katherine Harris a crook and a political hack, along with a few other names.

My point being, she committed verbal assault with facts, which drives the left nuts, because the left only knows character assassination through name calling and innuendo.

Someone has to carry the fight to the enemy, and Ann does it very well. One cannot always allow the enemy, and believe me, the left is our enemy, to attack, one must at some point hit hard and hit first.

[hotpotato]

I didn't say that she lied. You claimed she said much the same thing in both articles and I pointed out a major difference in what Coulter described as "bravery" in each article. My problem with her comment in her first article is what message it sends to those soldiers in Iraq that are maimed or killed while not in battle but still at war. I disagree with her take on bravery in the previous article and agree with her notably different take here. She changed her description on a very important point. That's not a lie.