This is our first exchange, which was (I think) the weekend before the '02 elections:
Dear Mr. Conason,I occasionally read your articles and never before felt compelled to visit your email box. However, there are a couple of things you wrote to which I want to respond.
First: "And perhaps more pertinently: "What's being lost here is the Republicans' lack of understanding of Judaism. They're decrying the behavior at 'Paul Wellstone's funeral' on Tuesday. The fact is, the funeral was Monday. Tuesday was the post-funeral celebration of his life -- a long-standing Jewish tradition ... This is how his survivors chose to celebrate his life. If the Republicans don't like it, it's none of their damned business." (The Norwegians and Swedes may be too reticent to send in their interpretations.)"
That's just not true. There is no such "long-standing Jewish tradition" of raucous celebration so soon after a death. In fact, the only Jewish traditions regarding death involve grieving, mourning, solemnity, comforting mourners, etc.
You might find this link informative and interesting, regarding how death and mourning are treated in the Jewish religion: http://www.myjewishlearning.com/lifecycle/Death.htm -- with particular attention to the section on "The Mourning Period."
If people want to have a raucous, political rally days after the tragic death of a man, his wife and their daughter, so be it -- but please don't let anyone con you into believing that it's part of Jewish tradition.
Oh, and as for why Mrs. Clinton was just about booed off the stage of Madison Square Garden last year, I don't know exactly why the fire fighters did so (although I have some good hunches), but I'm sure that the cops' vigorous response to seeing her up there at their event brought back memories from her campaign the previous year. Especially when she very publicly called four NYC cops "murderers" when they were about to go on trial re: the Diallo shooting. I mean, she did this right when jury selection began -- didn't she (or someone on her staff) realize that such harsh words from her about the 4 cops would make big news here?! (FYI: they were acquitted after a very brief deliberation period)
I just thought I'd share those two bits of info with you.
Best wishes,
(NYC GOP Chick)
From: Jconason1@aol.com
Message-ID: <1ba.8d46f7c.2af5edc6@aol.com>
Date: Sat, 2 Nov 2002 22:11:02 EST
Subject: Re: On the Wellstone FuneRallyIt's always interesting to see how people rationalize their double standards.
Thanks for writing.
I was kinda let down that such a glib and facile writer couldn't do better. But we did a little better last summer, when we had an actual dialogue, most of which isn't very interesting -- but here's how it started:
Dear Mr. Conason,And then we just had some chitchat back and forth.By any chance, did you happen to read even the first half of Ann Coulter's book?
I'm sure it's just unintentional humor on your part when you accuse Coulter of writing a book which is "replete ... with falsehoods and distortions" when you write an article about her book which is also replete with falsehoods and distortions.
For one thing, if you had read only as far as page 82 in her latest book, you'd know that she does indeed write about the VOA investigation, albeit not in dreary detail. Why do you accuse her of not doing so at all? Even a quick look at the index of her book shows that. You may be a lot of things, but sloppy has never been one of them.
I could do a blow-by-blow list of more falsehoods and distortions in your piece, but since you'll probably just reply with a snippy two-line snit -- if that much -- I won't bother typing it all out here.
I'm gonna go out on a limb here and take a wild guess, if I may: You take just about everything Sidney Blumenthal says and writes at face value, doncha? I've been reading parts of his gushing Clinton hagiography (in the brand new Borders in lower Manhattan) and I have to say that I haven't laughed this hard since...I don't know when! :-)
Just for fun (and because you're so cute when you get hysterical), I may actually buy one of your books. Which one do you recommend?
Well, I hope you enjoyed the holiday weekend!
Best wishes,
(NYC GOP Chick)
Received: from Jconason1@aol.com
Message-ID: <141.150a05f0.2c3b88fd@aol.com>
Date: Mon, 7 Jul 2003 22:39:57 EDT
Subject: Re: I Have A QuestionThanks (NYC GOP Chick). I recommend my new book, Big Lies. I can tell you'll just love it.
Received: from Jconason1@aol.com
Message-ID: <94.3a4148ac.2c3b8969@aol.com>
Date: Mon, 7 Jul 2003 22:41:45 EDT
Subject: Re: I Have A QuestionIt's true that she mentions one tiny aspect of the VOA "investigation." It's also true that she leaves out 99 per cent of it, because it was so embarrassing to the United States.