Skip to comments.
The Most Important Legislation In The Last Fifty Years:The Constitution Restoration Act Of 2004
EverVigilant.net ^
| 2-17-04
| Chuck Baldwin
Posted on 02/18/2004 4:06:44 PM PST by Federalist 78
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-55 last
To: Federalist 78
Very educational, thanks. Alas I wonder if the Supreme Coury will heed the truth this time.
41
posted on
02/19/2004 8:46:18 AM PST
by
mcg1969
To: AuntB
Thanks AB ~ good stuff.
42
posted on
02/19/2004 8:47:18 AM PST
by
blackie
(Be Well~Be Armed~Be Safe~Molon Labe!)
To: Federalist 78; joanie-f; Mudboy Slim; FBD; sultan88; scholar
>ping<
For your perusal, children.
No time to read now in any detail, myself; but, I sure *do* like the title.
...-BTTT-.
43
posted on
02/19/2004 8:48:31 AM PST
by
Landru
(Indulgences: 2 for a buck.)
To: Temple Owl
ping
44
posted on
02/19/2004 8:51:11 AM PST
by
Tribune7
(Vote Toomey April 27)
To: Federalist 78; DustyMoment; Valin; TBP; jgrubbs; sheltonmac; carenot; stopsign; agitator; ...
Thank you for posting this. I will ask my Senators and Representatives to support this bill!
45
posted on
02/19/2004 3:48:29 PM PST
by
The_Eaglet
(Conservative chat on IRC: http://searchirc.com/search.php?F=exact&T=chan&N=33&I=conservative)
To: The_Eaglet
To: AuntB
It IS worth looking into.
Gonna have to contact my Congress Critters in the morning.
redrock
47
posted on
02/19/2004 6:58:01 PM PST
by
redrock
("One man with courage....makes a majority"---Andrew Jackson)
To: redrock
I don't have to. My congress critters are already co-sponsors for the bill.
Sen Shelby and Sen Sessions of AL are 2 Ayes, along with all the R Reps from Alabama.
48
posted on
02/19/2004 7:14:10 PM PST
by
commish
(Freedom Tastes Sweetest to Those Who Have Fought to Preserve It)
To: The_Eaglet
Bump!
To: Federalist 78
#25
Such rulings and others equally outrageous have not been made because they are required by the Constitution as written, but because the Court no longer sees itself as bound by the words of the Constitution (as they swear to be) as Chief Justice John Marshall said it should be. Rather, the Court views the Constitution as a living, evolving document that means anything a majority on the Court says. Thomas Jefferson warned of such a lawless Court when he said, "The Constitution ... is a mere thing of wax in the hands of the judiciary which they may twist and shape into any form they please." I was privileged to attend a lecture last Friday by Justice Antonin Scalia here in San Diego. The topic of his lecture was "Free At Last, Free At Last: The Liberation of the Supreme Court from the Text of the Constitution." As Scalia said at the end of this talk, if we don't return to the original words of the Constitution, we are, in essence, giving 5 justices on the Supreme Court the authority to govern us as they see fit, without restraint of any type.
50
posted on
02/19/2004 8:27:09 PM PST
by
RightField
(The older you get . . . the older "old" is !)
To: Federalist 78
My Congressional Reps will hear from me TODAY!!!!
Start FReeping this bill NOW. Apply pressure at ALL levels of the Federal Government - from Bush down!!! We CANNOT allow this bill NOT to pass.
(Can you tell I'm onboard?)
:-)
51
posted on
02/20/2004 5:39:08 AM PST
by
DustyMoment
(Repeal CFR NOW!!)
To: RightField
" if we don't return to the original words of the Constitution, we are, in essence, giving 5 justices on the Supreme Court the authority to govern us as they see fit, without restraint of any type."
Chilling words that everyone should hear!
52
posted on
02/20/2004 9:32:25 AM PST
by
AuntB
(End all entitlements EXCEPT the military.)
To: Federalist 78
Thanks for the post....ping me also if you get more info.
To: AuntB
Article III, Section 2, Paragraph 2 of the U.S. Constitution:
In all Cases affecting Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls, and those in which a State shall be Party, the supreme Court shall have original Jurisdiction. In all the other Cases before mentioned, the supreme Court shall have appellate Jurisdiction, both as to Law and Fact, with such Exceptions, and under such Regulations as the Congress shall make.
Don't know if it will pass but its worth the effort.
54
posted on
02/20/2004 3:25:28 PM PST
by
LisaFab
To: DustyMoment; Federalist 78; sheltonmac; Ricardo4CP
My representative has heard from me about this.
55
posted on
02/26/2004 5:47:31 PM PST
by
The_Eaglet
(Conservative chat on IRC: http://searchirc.com/search.php?F=exact&T=chan&N=33&I=conservative)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-55 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson