Skip to comments.
McClintock to Talk About SF Homosexual "Marriages" on Savage and O'Reilly
N/A
| 2-18-04
| N/A
Posted on 02/18/2004 3:14:41 PM PST by go_tom
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 161-178 next last
1
posted on
02/18/2004 3:14:43 PM PST
by
go_tom
To: go_tom
Thanks for the info. Proud McClintock bump to the top.
To: go_tom
The attorney general of california should order all persons involved in breaking the law by issuing marriage licenses be arrested immediately. They are flagrantly violating the law. He is sworn to uphold the law.
To: go_tom
Something makes me think Tom would have put a halt to this nonsense already.
4
posted on
02/18/2004 3:18:52 PM PST
by
zygoat
To: go_tom
O'Reilly is strangely for this crap. Is he a closet demoRAT??
Wonder what Savage will say, will be watching this for sure.
I haven't heard what is Hannity saying?
5
posted on
02/18/2004 3:21:51 PM PST
by
stopem
To: BlackElk; TheAngryClam; churchillbuff; ninenot; Roscoe; Spiff; Reagan Man; Gophack
ping
6
posted on
02/18/2004 3:22:27 PM PST
by
go_tom
To: zygoat
Something makes me think Tom would have put a halt to this nonsense already. Even the governor doesn't have the power to stop a bunch of gay activist judges from twisting the law into a pretzel to promote Adam and Steve "marriages."
7
posted on
02/18/2004 3:22:59 PM PST
by
Young Rhino
(http://www.artofdivorce.com)
To: go_tom
Are these "shotgun" weddings or something?Why the big rush for the gays to get married when it's still against the law?
I'm mean...Who's gotten pregnant by the person they are marrying ?
If no one is pregnant by their intended spouses, where's the irreparable harm in their waiting a bit while they try to change the law so they can get married legally?
8
posted on
02/18/2004 3:25:14 PM PST
by
syriacus
(Kerry's on the record saying he chose the swift boat assignment because he thought it would be safer)
To: *Homosexual Agenda; EdReform; scripter; GrandMoM; backhoe; Yehuda; Clint N. Suhks; saradippity; ...
Homosexual Agenda Ping. Keep an eye out and see what McClintock says.
If anyone wants on or off this pinglist, let me know.
9
posted on
02/18/2004 3:33:09 PM PST
by
little jeremiah
(everyone is entitled to their opinion, but everyone isn't entitled to be right.)
To: Young Rhino
"Even the governor doesn't have the power to stop a bunch of gay activist judges from twisting the law into a pretzel to promote Adam and Steve "marriages."" But the governor has the duty to have the mayor arrested.
10
posted on
02/18/2004 3:34:06 PM PST
by
kellynla
(U.S.M.C. "C" 1/5 1st Mar Div. Viet Nam 69&70 Semper Fi VOTE "NO" ON PROPOSITIONS 55-58)
To: go_tom
Thanks for the heads-up. Looks like McClintock is the only elected official in Sacramento with a set of testicles. Is that Governor RINOld under his desk? ROFLMAO VOTE "NO" on Propositions 55-58!
11
posted on
02/18/2004 3:37:31 PM PST
by
kellynla
(U.S.M.C. "C" 1/5 1st Mar Div. Viet Nam 69&70 Semper Fi VOTE "NO" ON PROPOSITIONS 55-58)
To: go_tom
Licenses for gay marriages
= 
12
posted on
02/18/2004 3:43:37 PM PST
by
Lizavetta
(Savage is right - extreme liberalism is a mental disorder.)
To: Young Rhino
Even the governor doesn't have the power to stop a bunch of gay activist judges from twisting the law into a pretzel to promote Adam and Steve "marriages."Certainly a strong stand would put pressure on state law inforcement to arrest this guy. Although I would imagine that's what these pretentious gay-stapo types would like, to be "heros" standing up for their "rights"
Point being that the Gov is certainly not someone any social activist would fear, at his best not being capable of articulating the delicate point of why homosexual marriage needs to remain illegal, while a Gov McClintock would have been quite unambiguous on the matter.
13
posted on
02/18/2004 3:43:54 PM PST
by
PeoplesRep_of_LA
(Treason doth never prosper, for if it does, none dare call it treason)
To: kellynla
VOTE "NO" on Propositions 55-58!That's what I'm saying!
14
posted on
02/18/2004 3:44:39 PM PST
by
PeoplesRep_of_LA
(Treason doth never prosper, for if it does, none dare call it treason)
To: go_tom
I just turned on Savage. Osmiley may as well be gay...I have no desire to listen to him and have my blood preasure raised.
15
posted on
02/18/2004 4:01:23 PM PST
by
Revel
To: truthkeeper
Tom McClintock was the once chance California had to get things on the right track. They blew it! To afraid of Morrals.
16
posted on
02/18/2004 4:02:55 PM PST
by
Revel
To: go_tom
I wonder how this would be playing out if the Mayor were handing out CCW licenses instead of Marriage licenses?
17
posted on
02/18/2004 4:17:25 PM PST
by
Gritty
("Leftists only favor liberty when it is destructive of the society they live in-Dr John Ray)
To: go_tom
It's easy to talk when you don't have to back your talk up with action.
That's why McClintock is talking nonstop.
18
posted on
02/18/2004 4:19:29 PM PST
by
Luis Gonzalez
(Unless the world is made safe for Democracy, Democracy won't be safe in the world.)
To: Revel
"Tom McClintock was the once chance California had to get things on the right track. They blew it! To afraid of Morrals." We recalled one idiot, no reason why we can't recall another...That rope around Governor RINOld's neck is getting tighter every day!
19
posted on
02/18/2004 4:19:38 PM PST
by
kellynla
(U.S.M.C. "C" 1/5 1st Mar Div. Viet Nam 69&70 Semper Fi VOTE "NO" ON PROPOSITIONS 55-58)
To: kellynla
More power to you in that!
I would be worried that in 2008 Arnold might be running for President.
20
posted on
02/18/2004 4:23:33 PM PST
by
Revel
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 161-178 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson