[Arpege92]

Wow....all of that in one incident huh? Death to the LEO's for trying very hard to not have to arrest an idiot and his daughter who were fighting on the side of the road. By law, these cops are required to investigate domestic disturbances and if one party is hurt, the other party is arrested even if the hurt party doesn't want to press charges.....IT'S THE LAW!

[archy]

Wow....all of that in one incident huh? Death to the LEO's for trying very hard to not have to arrest an idiot and his daughter who were fighting on the side of the road.

Yep. Just like the L.A.P.D. goons jailed for the federal civil rights violations when they tried very hard not to arrest Rodney King when he kept attacking their flashlights and nightsticks with his head and face.

[eno_]

If you commit a war crime against an Iraqi soldier in the process of obeying an unlawful order, you can get the firing squad.

I'd propose making civil rights violations under color of authority a capital crime. Much cheaper than settling lawsuits, and probably far more effective. Calling a refusal to show ID "probable cause" is definitely way too stupid to live.

Currently we literally protect enemy soldiers more than we protect our fellow citizens.

[Labyrinthos]

Death to the LEO's for trying very hard to not have to arrest an idiot and his daughter who were fighting on the side of the road. By law, these cops are required to investigate domestic disturbances and if one party is hurt, the other party is arrested even if the hurt party doesn't want to press charges.....IT'S THE LAW!

You're not making sense. If the daughter is there and she identifies the person she was fighting with as her father, then why did they need to see his ID? And if the arrest was mandatory in domestic disputes where a party is hurt, then why is the refusal to produce the ID probable cause for an arrest which is apparently required by law?

[CHICAGOFARMER]

.....IT'S THE LAW!

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

See that where this constitutition thing comes in.

It use to be that the badge represented a peace officer that kept the peace.

Todays law enforcement officer does just that enforces the laws as written by some liberal government that we are here to help you and we will enforce the law.

Notice this has nothing to do with keeping the peace as peace officers used to do 40-50 years ago.

[CHICAGOFARMER]

.....IT'S THE LAW!

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

See that where this constitutition thing comes in.

It use to be that the badge represented a peace officer that kept the peace.

Todays law enforcement officer does just that enforces the laws as written by some liberal government that we are here to help you and we will enforce the law.

Notice this has nothing to do with keeping the peace as peace officers used to do 40-50 years ago.

YOU notice in the video the cop was not interested in keeping the peace.

[CHICAGOFARMER]

.....IT'S THE LAW!

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

See that where this constitutition thing comes in.

It use to be that the badge represented a peace officer that kept the peace.

Todays law enforcement officer does just that enforces the laws as written by some liberal government that we are here to help you and we will enforce the law.

Notice this has nothing to do with keeping the peace as peace officers used to do 40-50 years ago.

YOU notice in the video the cop was not interested in keeping the peace.