Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: capitan_refugio
really? I was under the impreassion thst the valence bonds of carbon in the adamantine configuration were chemically inert and very stable at STP.
48 posted on 02/18/2004 10:03:33 PM PST by King Prout (I am coming to think that the tree of liberty is presently dying of thirst.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]


To: King Prout
It has been a while since I cracked a crystalography book (+/- 25 years), but I'll take a stab at this.

I recall that the difference between graphite and diamond is in the arrangement of the carbon atoms and the strength of the carbon-carbon bonds. Diamond has a covalent bond; graphite has van der Waal bonds. I recognize "adamantine" as a description of "luster," so I'm not sure an "adamantine configuration" is. My Manual of Minerology does not go into enough detail.

Because of the carbon tetrahedrons in diamond, there is a lot of "open space" between the atoms. I think this accounts for diamond's cleavage. (Graphite, one the other hand, tends to be sheet-like.) So in diamond, the carbon bonds are strong, but as the crystaline structure is removed from the great pressures and temps of the mantle, the structure becomes unstable.

Sorry I don't have my crystalogrpahy book handy. It is out in the garage in a box somewhere.

53 posted on 02/19/2004 2:13:20 AM PST by capitan_refugio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson