Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Why Haiti's Such a Mess (And Why Bill Clinton Was So Wrong to Prop Up Aristide)
History News Network ^ | Feb 10, 2004 | Michael Radu

Posted on 02/18/2004 7:58:48 AM PST by XHogPilot

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-23 last
To: Austin Willard Wright
We let Haiti go due in part to FDR's "Good Neighbor" policy towards Latin America and the Carribean. While that policy was appropriate for more developed nations such as Brazil, it wasn't for places such as Haiti. In reality, we should have held on to Haiti just as we did with Puerto Rico.

I wouldn't want Haiti to become for us in the War on Terrorism what Cuba (another counrty we liberated and administered) was for us in the Cold War (which Castor is still fighting).
21 posted on 02/18/2004 1:28:09 PM PST by bobjam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

Comment #22 Removed by Moderator

To: Cicero; XHogPilot
"Besides this ongoing democratic charade, since 1994 the Catholic Left in Haiti has destroyed what little remained after two centuries of savagery in the name of social justice and heretical liberation theology."

Paging WCC/NCC/UCC.

As I remember, when I returned from Haiti, having lived in Gonaives and Port-au-Prince for a few months each, I was not very optimistic about Haiti's future. Not that the Haitians were not worth it, but the liberal/internationalist approach was self-defeating (and there was a good reason we set up camp across the street from the Catholic church in Gonaives when we arrived, control). The liberal church harms more than helps in these countries. Venezuela and Brazil (http://www.ncccusa.org/braziltrip.html) are now on the same path lead by corrupt communist "populists" with the ever present influence of Castro (http://www.ncccusa.org/news/04cubadelegationwrapup.html - note how NCC handles the 78 prisoners sentence by Castro and the DoD not letting the NCC "visit" the detainees at GITMO).

Not much has changed from when "Who The Real Ogres Are" was written [http://www.nocastro.com/archives/elian24.htm]:

"Perhaps surprisingly, part of the extensive pro-Castro support network in the U.S. is the National Council of Churches (NCC). This "religious" group has a long history of pro-Castro activities. Kenneth Lloyd Billingsley, the editorial director of the Pacific Research Institute in San Francisco and author of From Mainline to Sidelines: The Social Witness of the National Council of Churches, says about the NCC for wanting to send Elián back to Cuba, "This should come as no surprise since the NCC does not represent American Protestants and has long served as a lobby for the Marxist dictatorship of Fidel Castro."

"Billingsley, explains that the NCC remained silent about Castro's crimes from its beginning in 1959. In 1968 the NCC issued their first statement about Cuba urging the U. S. to recognize the Castro regime. This despite the fact that one of the first casualties of Castro's revolution was organized religion. Billingsley says that in 1977, a year before his election as NCC president, Methodist bishop James Armstrong "led a delegation of American church officials to Cuba, where they supported the regime's repression." After this first NCC official delegation visit to Cuba, they declared to be "challenged and inspired by Cuba and flatly denied that the Cuban regime persecuted Christians."

"However, in 1977 Amnesty International stated that Cuba had "the longest-term political prisoners to be found anywhere in the world." He points out that "In 1980, the NCC published a book claiming that "Cubans are the only Latin Americans who have broken with dependent capitalism and its accompanying dehumanization of the common people." According to former imprisoned poet Armando Valladares, "Cuban officials used pro-Castro statements of American clergy to torment prisoners. That was worse for the Christian political prisoners than the beatings or the hunger. Incomprehensibly to us, while we waited for the embrace of solidarity from our brothers in Christ, those who were embraced were our tormentors."

The liberal church leaders vilified Reagan as they now vilify Bush. Hmmmm. Compare Nicaragua (http://www.cia.gov/cia/publications/factbook/geos/nu.html) and El Salvador (http://www.cia.gov/cia/publications/factbook/geos/es.html) and Honduras (http://www.cia.gov/cia/publications/factbook/geos/ho.html) today. Should we mourn the collapse of the USSR?

The liberal church loved Clinton (http://www.layman.org/layman/news/news-around-church/ird-finds-ironies.htm, http://ncccusa2.org/news/news72.html) and Carter. Iran, Somalia, North Korea, Haiti, Bosnia/Kosovo (http://www.unmikonline.org/news.htm), ... , bin Laden.


/rant
23 posted on 02/18/2004 1:46:07 PM PST by optimistically_conservative (This tagline recently seen at Taglinus FreeRepublicus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-23 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson