To: goldstategop
John Edwards is now the Clintons' stalking horse to stop the Kerry avalanche.
Edwards benefited by the fact that Wisconsin holds an "open" primary in which independents and Republicans, as well as Democrats, can vote. He won among independents and Republicans, while Kerry won big among Democrats.
Sounds as if it's "our type" trying to use Edwards to stop Kerry, not the Clintons...
I get to vote in the open primary in Georgia March 2...which of them do you think I should vote for?
4 posted on
02/18/2004 3:18:34 AM PST by
Amelia
(I have trouble taking some people seriously.)
To: Amelia
This is the spin that Kerry is using to minimize Edwards. Seriously how may republicans can make that much of a difference? Not enough to push kerry to 6% distance.
To: Amelia
From this board, I'd say the unreported story is how many Republicans voted Dean or Kerry, not Edwards. That doesn't mean that they can be counted on in the general in the Kerry column. In fact, I've yet to hear of a Republican voting for Edwards, despite this article. We WANT Kerry as the nominee; it is much easier to go up against a dull schmuck than someone who actually knows how to talk to people and can think on his feet.
8 posted on
02/18/2004 3:52:20 AM PST by
alwaysconservative
(If a decorated firefighter becomes an arsonist, is he still considered a hero? Aldrich)
To: Amelia
I'm in Georgia too. I was just going to ask the same question. Who should I vote for? I was ready to vote for Dean but that's obviously a waste.
I think I must hold my nose and vote for Kerry. He really would be the best candidate for President Bush to run against.
21 posted on
02/18/2004 5:13:13 AM PST by
Republican Red
(Karmic hugs welcomed!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson