Skip to comments.
Craig Barrett confirms 64 bit address extensions for Xeon. And Prescott (Intel follows AMD )
The Inquirer ^
| Tuesday 17 February 2004, 18:13
| INQUIRER staff:
Posted on 02/17/2004 6:02:02 PM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-42 last
To: mpreston
I do not count emachines in the Server market.
I look forward to seeing a significant AMD 64 offerings in the near future. The last 6 months have not seen much flexibility in the midrange server market.
41
posted on
02/18/2004 4:04:21 PM PST
by
CyberCowboy777
(We should never ever apologize for who we are, what we believe in, and what we stand for.)
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach; Dead Corpse
I am now running my 2500+ 333FSB at 3200+ 400FSB.
It looks like the CPU will handle more but I have had to turn up the timers on my cheapo Crucial memory as it it failing.
AMD is putting out some great chips.
42
posted on
02/21/2004 5:51:24 PM PST
by
CyberCowboy777
(We should never ever apologize for who we are, what we believe in, and what we stand for.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-42 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson