Skip to comments.
Appeals Court Upholds Do-Not-Call Registry
Foxnews ^
| 2-17-04
Posted on 02/17/2004 5:01:08 PM PST by Indy Pendance
Edited on 04/22/2004 12:39:01 AM PDT by Jim Robinson.
[history]
DENVER
(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...
TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Extended News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: donotcall; privacy
To: Indy Pendance
.
To: Indy Pendance
EXCELLE...hold on, the phone is ringing, again.
3
posted on
02/17/2004 5:03:03 PM PST
by
TADSLOS
(Right Wing Infidel since 1954)
To: Indy Pendance
Can someone tell me why it is important that pollsters get to have special invasion of privacy considerations? Why are they exempt from the registry?
Do pollsters serve a necessary purpose that I'm somehow missing? Seems to me that all they are good for is to persuade flaky people to jump on popular bandwagons.
4
posted on
02/17/2004 5:16:02 PM PST
by
Jim_Curtis
(Free Milosevic)
To: TADSLOS
EXCELLE...hold on, the phone is ringing, again. Now the scumbags are calling and asking if we are a business, presumable because we would then not be on a DNCL.
"No".
Then they hang up.
So we were thinking of interesting retorts. The winner so far is, "No, we are a CHURCH. F*** Off."
5
posted on
02/17/2004 5:22:30 PM PST
by
Gorzaloon
(Contents may have settled during shipping, but this tagline contains the stated product weight.)
To: Indy Pendance
Officials in the telemarketing industry did not immediately return calls seeking comment. LOL!
6
posted on
02/18/2004 6:03:45 AM PST
by
steve-b
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson