[thoughtomator]

My objection is precisely the same. Only in the Moore case, I view the Federal judges who are overriding their oaths in the illegal suppression of religious expression. According to the law itself, Moore was obeying both the letter and the spirit of the law in his actions. (If you don't like the law, move to have it amended - but the fact of the law as it stands supports Moore.)

[jimt]

...but the fact of the law as it stands supports Moore.

While you can keep saying that until you're blue in the face, it doesn't. And obviously.