[jimt]

Why don't you try reading the law before you make that judgement.

I'm sure the AG of Alabama and the Alabama Supreme Court (less Roy boy) and all the Federal judges are ignorant of the law. Yup, yup.

Be serious. Roy lost unanimously and continually because of his illegal stance.

[thoughtomator]

The AG of Alabama was in the midst of a very high-stakes conflict of interest on a very similar matter. The Federal judges, as you know, are interested first in securing and extending their own power.

It is clear to me that Moore followed the only applicable law - that of the Alabama Constitution. There is nothing in federal law that contradicts what he did, either.

I invite you to try and come up with a credible legal narrative that says Moore broke a law. I have yet to see it done (not for lack of asking). So far, all anyone has been able to come up with is that the federal judiciary is supreme and cannot be challenged - no matter what a judge might decide to do. A raw appeal to authority or power is not law. Law has a very specific meaning, and the processes suggested so far as being applicable to Moore do not comport with that meaning.