Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Lunatic Fringe
D.R. Horton is not responsible... Jorge was working for a SUBCONTRACTOR... Why not sue the sub-contractor? Because they don't have the deep pockets, that's why.

Horton could have easily avoided any culpability by insisting the subcontractor indemnify them against claims resulting from wrongdoing on the part of the subcontractor.

In a business rife with illegals I sure would.

12 posted on 02/17/2004 8:04:51 AM PST by skeeter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: skeeter
Horton could have easily avoided any culpability by insisting the subcontractor indemnify them against claims resulting from wrongdoing on the part of the subcontractor.

I work for a general contractor, and I do business with many subcontractors. Part of my job is to make sure every subcontract I write has all these CYA provisions.

Nevertheless, I know that ultimately the general contractor will be held responsible when the subcontractor has no assets.

Deep pockets is all you need to know. A judge can invalidate all those disclaimers in the subcontract very quickly.

Somebody’s gotta pay these millions of dollars, and the humble frame subcontractor will declare bankruptcy and leave the general contractor holding the bag.

It’s always been that way.

17 posted on 02/17/2004 8:11:32 AM PST by george wythe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson