Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Flashman_at_the_charge
McClintock was the top GOP vote-getter in the state, when he ran for controller in the 2002 election. He got practically no support from the state GOP and was outspent by his opponent by 5 to 1 and yet in spite of all this he only lost by less than 1 percent of the vote.

Blah blah blah we heard this all during the election. How sad that his side basically claims "he was the best loser of the bunch in 2002! but the GOP wouldn't support him" Silly. If he can't raise his own funds, he does not belong in politics. He's clearly not a team player yet his whining supporters expect that GOP cash to support him. McClinton and his supporters have shown and shown again they're just a bunch of selfish losers.

117 posted on 02/17/2004 2:57:35 AM PST by ClintonBeGone (<a href="http://www.freerepublic.com/~clintonbegone/">Hero</font></a>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies ]


To: ClintonBeGone
Blah blah blah we heard this all during the election.

My goodness, what a well reasoned and eloquent retort. During this thread alone you have referred to Tom McClintock, a principled and passionate conservative, as a clown, a kook, a self centred greedy little punk, not conservative, unelectable, a Dem ally and as someone who works for Bustamante. God help Michigan if you’re an example of a Michigan conservative.

118 posted on 02/17/2004 5:59:43 AM PST by Flashman_at_the_charge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson