[tpaine]

templar wrote:
Well, OK, so ... according to the Constituiton: Who is given the authority to determine what is and is not repugnant to the Constitution?

______________________________________


Ultimately, every man is his own judge of what law he follows.
For instance, booze prohibition failed because millions of Americans refused to obey its repugnant 'law'..

[templar]

Ultimately, every man is his own judge of what law he follows.

OK, tpaine, where is that in the Cosntitution? The Constitutioin specifically addresses this issue. To me, it is starting to look like you believe in some part of the Constitution but not others. What is any different between you and any other person that finds some part fo the Constitution objectionable and decides to ignore it?

BTW, "booze prohibiton" ended because Congress and the States went through the Constitutional process of repealing the ammendment, not because people disobeyed the law.