Posted on 02/16/2004 3:51:09 AM PST by JesseHousman
We have Clark saying it
We have her friends saying it
We have her parents saying it
And
We have her saying it on film.......but
Not enough evidence to run with it....
Hm, must be waiting for a blue dress.
But it's what the dumbed-down electorate wants. They can understand this... big spinned headline... wink, wink... nod, nod and a raised eyebrow. They don't have the time or desire to follow up on a story... and they don't use the internet for getting news.
Those from Arkansas make their victims commit suicide. I think the Massachusetts ending of choice is driving them over a bridge.
Lets mark this for future reference. I'm sure Bush will be accused of another Willie Horton moment, when, like then, the original charge came from a fellow democrat.
If it looks like Kerry pressured her into exile in Kenya (which would be hard to prove)
If Teresa walks out on him, which she won't because liberal women stand by their babykillin men.
Rippin
makes me sicker!
The mainstream media is killing this country.
I wouldn't be so sure. That's the ultimate slap in the face -- to cheat on your wife AND use her money to bankroll your campaign. That's really low.
Not with Teresa, it doesn't. She would be more happy just remaining busy with all her lefty contributions and activities. She does not need the White House at all. And she disdains being embarrassed (in public).
I would not be surprised if she is the one who will eventually be responsible for exposing this story in the future, take it from someone who knew her well.
In looking at the facts as they develop, they appear to indicate this: The alleged affair apparently took place in 1999 and 2000 when she was a student at Clark; she may well have been an intern then; the story is not neccessarily the affair but events that happened later, probably in 2003 or 2004 after she went to Columbia and maybe after she went to work for AP; that is the "nastier" they are attempting to cover up.
There is a video tape; at least one copy is in the hands of someone in London; there are letters of which there are copies. Very difficult to sit on hard evidence; determined sitters like the Dem media can sit for some time but ultimately all they can do is control the spin when the facts leak out.
The media was able to effectively blunt the Broderick rape story for the entire relevant time period. At this point, it is generally accepted that Mr. Clinton in fact committed criminal rape on Juanita Broderick; and that the media covered up the story until his term was over. Whatever we may think of the Dems, there is a significant element in the party that does not want to spend the next four years dealing with stories about sexual misconduct by their president. In addition, there are Dems, Hilly and Billy from the Ozarks for example, who may well have a vested interest in exposing John Kerry.
This is perking along pretty well and the facts are likely to come out, no matter what the media does.
Exactly.
In the words of Hitlery and Billious: "Sooner rather than later."
Exactly.
In the words of Hitlery and Billious: "Sooner rather than later."
You mean she actually showed up for a show? Frankly I'm sick of her and hope she has this newest baby real soon so we'll be rid of her for a while. Today they said they were surprised she showed up (at her usual 7 a.m.), because she thought her water would break and that it could break today.
She seems to need alot of attention and reminds me of Kathy Lee Gifford. The day E.D. came on national TV and talked about finding out that her 3rd husband was seeing someone else, etc., was the day my opinion of her changed. I realize that she was angry and hurt, but that was no place to air your family's dirty laundry. It was none of our business. Everything with her is "me, me, me!"
Her attendance for the program has been less than stellar. She takes more time off than any of the other hosts, and she seems to have more flex-hours than anyone else on the show. Usually four days a week, she arrives on screen at 7 a.m. while the other folks are always there at 6 a.m. I realize she has all those kids, but a job is a job, and it's obvious that Fox caters to her. Lorne Greene, Kiran Chetry, and even Juliette Huddy are always there, and when they cover for E.D., they manage to show up at 6 a.m. despite their personal responsibilities.
I know I'm ranting on about E.D. Hill, but there's one other thing that really ticked me off. A week or so ago she interviewed Laura Bush at the White House about the red dress program and the Heart Association. She was gone from the show the whole week of the interview. I'm wondering what E.D. has done to earn such an interview. Surely there are other female journalists who deserved the assignment more than her. Someone who is hardly ever at work, or fails to do her fair share of the job responsibilities doesn't deserve to interview the First Lady at the White House. E.D. has NEVER worked a weekend, whereas Brian and Steve have.
All this might sound petty, but it's pretty obvious that she has a Daddy somewhere at Fox News. I only wish I could have had the work schedule she appears to have. I'd have been living on easy street. Her being a democrat doesn't really bother me as much as the fact that she's never pulled her fair weight on the program, yet seems to make out like a bandit.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.