Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: jriemer
Just judging by your title and posts as a disinterested observer, this whole thread really would appear to someone as a cult. I mean the whole thing is rather bizarre. I think we lose sight of how specialized and entirely new a jargon has been created on the internet for such situations; I realize it is in jest yet it does also serve a function. Thats what makes it strange. I would like a panel of psychologists, sociologists and language profs to analyze the entire thing. I'm sure that their conclusions would be that the inmates are running the asylum. My only point is that its an odd cultural-language phenomenon, and when observed from ouside the reference point of FR would be viewed as pathological. Having said that, I hope this comment does not become a victim of the ever watchful kittie eye.
72 posted on 02/16/2004 8:30:31 AM PST by Rennes Templar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Rennes Templar
The history of "Zot" by Admin Moderator

There are one or two individuals who, for whatever reason, enjoy signing up new accounts here every single day to post leftist drivel. Sometimes they are vanities from DemocraticUnderground. Sometimes they are articles from other far-left sources. Sometimes they are nothing but vile doctored images or profanity laced tirades. Sometimes they are from legitimate sources but happen to strike the eye of the poster as being something that would infuriate conservatives.

The posters in question always post the articles, and then don't reply. They then post other articles, again not replying. This was going on for months. Jim would confirm by looking at the IP addresses and other aspects of the user's 'footprint' that it was the returning troll, and we would nuke the accounts. This went on for months.

Then some of the opportunists who wanted to harm the forum started a whispering campaign, complaining about articles being deleted. They would play off of the fact that the trolls' articles were being pulled to complain that there was some sort of agenda of squelching legitimate conservative postings going on by the moderators.

One day I decided to try something new. I decided, instead of letting the trolls get what they want and have their posts up as flame bait, and instead of pulling the threads outright, I would move their post aside and replace it with something that hopefully others would find humorous. I would do this out in the forum for all to see. The original piece would be available through the history link for the curious, who could see if there was some sort of censorship campaign going on. And the freepers could have fun mocking the troll if they so liked.

It so happens that the way I did it the first time was using a screen shot from Caddyshack, where the pastor gets hit by a lightning bolt. Being a bit of a fan of the comic strip "B.C." I captioned the photo with the lightning bolt sound that Johnny Hart used in his strip- ZOT! That is where the term Zot originated.

Now, sometimes we "zot", and sometimes we simply pull it. It depends on a number of factors, including how busy we are at the time. But whenever you see a Zot, you can be sure that the user was a 'newbie' who was doing their hit-and-run posting, and that if you as a well-established freeper thought the article would have made an interesting discussion, then you could probably post the same piece yourself without incident (although the most vile of the stuff probably would get pulled, and Jim reserves the right to remove anyone who he feels is constantly trying to push leftist propaganda on the forum). Anyway, that is the history and background behind zotting.

For one or two individuals to keep trolling around FR and putting themselves up for such ridicule, there must a strange pathology there, don't you think?

78 posted on 02/16/2004 10:59:57 AM PST by weegee (Election 2004: Re-elect President Bush... Don't feed the trolls.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies ]

To: Rennes Templar
Exactly how disinterested are you? 8^)
82 posted on 02/16/2004 11:31:05 AM PST by jriemer (We are a Republic not a Democracy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies ]

To: Rennes Templar; jriemer
I think we lose sight of how specialized and entirely new a jargon has been created on the internet for such situations; I realize it is in jest yet it does also serve a function. Thats what makes it strange. I would like a panel of psychologists, sociologists and language profs to analyze the entire thing.

Oh, sociologists have already studied this, there isn't anything unique in it. It's a naturally developing phenomenon when you have groups of people organize around a common interest. As they build a history together and cohere into a group, they develop internal meanings related to events, inside "jokes" and inside "language". Think of any family... they can say to one another "come on, don't do an Aunt Marge" and break up into peals of laughter.

The Internet is a large community but did develop a specialized language for dealing with some aspects of it... Free Republic is just a much smaller sub-set of the Internet community and developed it's own specialized language for dealing with some aspects of the life in the forum :-)

98 posted on 02/16/2004 3:54:48 PM PST by Tamzee (EARTH FIRST!!! We'll stripmine the other planets later...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson