Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Dutchgirl
Liberals today proudly take credit for Truman’s and Kennedy’s roles in containing communism, but they prefer to forget that, for the last half of the Cold War, liberals used “cold warrior” as an epithet.
In 1992 I labored, in fury, to find a response to the Democratic rebuttal of the Republican Convention's claim of having won the Cold War, "but Democrats fought in Vietnam just like Republicans did!" In Vietnam, yes. But after 1972, it is exactly as Krauthammer says. "liberals used 'cold warrior' as an epithet."

21 posted on 02/15/2004 1:46:07 PM PST by conservatism_IS_compassion (Belief in your own objectivity is the essence of subjectivity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: thesummerwind; imintrouble; E.G.C.
after 1972, it is exactly as Krauthammer says. "liberals used 'cold warrior' as an epithet,"
and Ronald Reagan led us to transcend communism.

And that should be the epitaph of the Kerry '04 campaign.


24 posted on 02/15/2004 1:51:18 PM PST by conservatism_IS_compassion (Belief in your own objectivity is the essence of subjectivity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

To: conservatism_IS_compassion
"Then there are the liberal internationalists. They like to dream, and to the extent they are aware of our unipolar power, they don’t like it. They see its use for anything other than humanitarianism or reflexive self-defense as an expression of national selfishness."

There is, I think, another reason why liberals don't like our unipolar power. Krauthammer is too civil to mention it, but I will:

Liberals know that, entrusted with such power, they would assuredly abuse it. Consequently, they assume others would, as well -- especially the "evil" conservatives.

Thus, the liberal objection to American unipolar power is based upon a projection of their own moral weaknesses.

In their innermost selves, liberals intrinsically know they should not be entrusted with power -- no matter how desperately they seek it. And they are right...

46 posted on 02/15/2004 3:49:43 PM PST by okie01 (www.ArmorforCongress.com...because Congress isn't for the morally halt and the mentally lame.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

To: conservatism_IS_compassion
"Then there are the liberal internationalists. They like to dream, and to the extent they are aware of our unipolar power, they don’t like it. They see its use for anything other than humanitarianism or reflexive self-defense as an expression of national selfishness."

There is, I think, another reason why liberals don't like our unipolar power. Krauthammer is too civil to mention it, but I will:

Liberals know that, entrusted with such power, they would assuredly abuse it. Consequently, they assume others would, as well -- especially the "evil" conservatives.

Thus, the liberal objection to American unipolar power is based solely upon a projection of their own moral weaknesses.

In their innermost selves, liberals intrinsically know they should not be entrusted with power -- no matter how desperately they seek it. And they are right...

47 posted on 02/15/2004 3:50:25 PM PST by okie01 (www.ArmorforCongress.com...because Congress isn't for the morally halt and the mentally lame.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson