Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: NutCrackerBoy; Aquinasfan; seamole
I had a dinner party on Sat. night with all in attendance opposing "marriage is between a man and a woman" - all were for marriage in any sexual combo and all were for civil unions as the last choice. Two likened this issue to a civil rights issue - slavery. I was absolutely stunned!

One of them said "if two people love each other they should be allowed to get married" and I said "what if I love two men and want to marry both of them, by your definition, you'd be discriminating against me if you didn't allow me to marry them both" - all of them thought I was nuts and that situation would never happen. None of them were aware that there is a couple of cases of polygamists waiting before the supreme court... and looking to us here in Mass to see how our situation ends up.

All in all, I was distressed and realized (as does my husband) that civil unions will indeed probably go through in March.

9 posted on 02/16/2004 7:56:34 AM PST by american colleen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: american colleen
all were for marriage in any sexual combo and all were for civil unions as the last choice.

The debate on the floor of the legislature was an eye-opener for me. It was divided between the true-believing "civil rights" crowd and the "let the people vote" crowd. I didn't hear one legislator criticize homosexual "marriage" itself.

10 posted on 02/16/2004 8:30:41 AM PST by Aquinasfan (Isaiah 22:22, Rev 3:7, Mat 16:19)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson