To: nwrep
I don't see any adjustments made in this model for Democrat vote fraud. Therefore, it's not valid.
To: So Cal Rocket
Therefore, it's not valid.Oh, man. You're post #3.......I hardly had any time to wallow in the beauty of this story. LOL
But, you have a dang good point.
4 posted on
02/14/2004 5:53:31 PM PST by
Puppage
(You may disagree with what I have to say, but I will defend to your death my right to say it)
To: So Cal Rocket
"I don't see any adjustments made in this model for Democrat vote fraud. Therefore, it's not valid."
For the Bush-Gore election:
They predicted 50.8% of the 2 party vote for Gore and he got only 50.3% (of the 2 party vote).
Very Close - and underestimating Bush slightly.
The two factors unaccounted for:
Disgust with democrats in the Clinton Administration.
Democratic vote fraud.
To: So Cal Rocket
There has been fraud in previous elections and the model has still performed.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson