[AntiGuv]

Thank you , but I am not myself interested in personal anecdotes from either the employed, the unemployed, or the friends of the employed. The employment and income statistics are what they are and they are not even remotely in line with historical patterns of growth.

[EGPWS]

Thank you , but I am not myself interested in personal anecdotes from either the employed, the unemployed, or the friends of the employed. The employment and income statistics are what they are and they are not even remotely in line with historical patterns of growth.

Good enough, AntiGuv, I wish you the best in your quest of obtaining a thirst quenching half empty glass of water.

I'll be thinking of ya', in April, when I file my taxes.

Oh, and no need to say it, however, your welcome.

[narses]

No doubt you prefer ignorance. You should be aware that the statistics offer wildly different views. One government survey shows a massive set of job losses, another government survey shows robust job growth. You may prefer statistics, but ask yourself how many people YOU know who are unemployed, how many are employed, and WHY. Use your senses and your brains rather than "statistics" and your conclusions may have more real world validity.