To: Dataman
Ah, no, my friend; you're trapped in that logical thinking of yours. Liberals have no such constraints. Don't you understand? There is no continuity. If they abort it, it never was a child. Like Clark says, it isn't a child until the mother chooses. So an aborted thing never was a child, and a child never was a candidate for abortion.
"But, but," you splutter. "That makes no sense!"
Ex act ly. It's magic. It doesn't have to make sense.
Dan
37 posted on
02/14/2004 5:41:09 AM PST by
BibChr
("...behold, they have rejected the word of the LORD, so what wisdom is in them?" [Jer. 8:9])
To: BibChr
I love your statements. :)
Really, it's quite simple. Send your children to a school compatible with your religion, so that the mention of God is not followed by "dammit."
44 posted on
02/14/2004 8:45:35 AM PST by
onyx
(Your secrets are safe with me and all my friends.)
To: BibChr
Ah, no, my friend; you're trapped in that logical thinking of yours. Liberals have no such constraints. Don't you understand? There is no continuity. If they abort it, it never was a child. Like Clark says, it isn't a child until the mother chooses. So an aborted thing never was a child, and a child never was a candidate for abortion. Well DANG! If that tooth my dentist pulled was never there, he should never have billed me!
Let's see..
Women abort children that are not there,
When Kerry loses, he will have never run,
and secularists scurry around erasing traces of and being offended by a God who never existed.
Maybe I should reconsider pitying liberals.
54 posted on
02/14/2004 9:36:12 AM PST by
Dataman
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson