Replies

Thus far I have learned little about "Joe Wilson" and his Saudi connection. That may well be what has ticked him off, and sent him into a downward spiral. Maybe that connection was ended and his future ended before it took root.

The leftist squeal the loudest when they themselves get stuck. Note how hillary handled her hubby's exposure, it's a "VAST RIGHT WING CONSPIRACY", she has never been required to retract those words. This is insane, words of a lunatic, yet they still stand today, and the left allows her their leadership of the senate and the treasury of their party. So we are not talking about sane people here.

Jimmy Carter's supposed strength is a "good" Southern Christian. I have read what is required of Christians, and Jimmy Carter is a wolf in sheep's clothing.

The Democrat Party of today is likened to a pyramid scheme. Ronald Reagan a former democrat and what he learned through his hollywood days is described in a book called "Reagan's Wars" (author's name escapes me), lays the foundation for what is happening today. Hollywood was the seed bed of the ideology of modern American liberals.

Jesse Jackson's words of "institutional racism" had been strange to me, because they made no sense. Jesse Jackson's party controlled the "institutions" of politics, economy, education and religion since FDR. What I learned since he first started uttering those words, while his party controlled the institutions, they had not been able to turn them upside down. That took a clintons administration to plant a new crop into those institutions.

This new crop have no inhibition about using those institutions for self gain, which is the pyramid scheme. Communism/socialism is by it nature power to a few, displacement of the masses, and destruction to foundations that maintain a constitution rule of law that limits power to a few.

The Saudi government seems to be going through a similar evolution. Wealth and power to a few and a family feud threatens their very existence. What irony it is that President Bush sought early on to begin a path to energy independence, the left through political, educational, and religous institutions would not allow the path to energy independence to go anywhere.

The dirt worshipers, have managed to take control of our energy policy. JFKerry seems to be on that board of directors. They see visions of windmills and solar panels as a method of maintaining our economy. There is nothing wrong with "clean" energy, however that is not what is sought. Dirt worshipers has become the religion of the left, and through their policies enacted in congress and by dirt worshiping judges have caused far worse economic and environmental damage than any policy of the "right".

Back to Mr. Wilson his Saudi connection and the Democrat party's connection. Saudi royalty is a useful tool because of the "power" they have over the economy of this nation. Interesting they decided to give US a hike in the price at the pump these past few days. Nice little dent in a recovering economy, and who stands to gain when dents can be inflicted into a recovering economy?

Liberals are not honest people at their very foundation is deception and they expose what they can do without as a front. Liberals have declared war on President Bush which in effect means this nation. How many in this nation will be seduced by their effort to destroy his credibility is yet to be discovered.

"Joe Wilson" is symbolic of that pyramid scheme. Wilson's problem is he hasn't figured out he is nothing more than a tool and his usefullness will soon end. Wilson is like an addict on what feel likes the greatest high he has ever had. Old Joe is going to wake up one of these days and find himself not needed anymore.

Your pyramid analogy is a productive line of thought. Who's at the top of the pyramid in the Democratic Party? Labor unions would have been my first thought, but your focus on the dirt worshippers adds a revealing angle to it. The history of that goes back to FDR's Department of the Interior and Harold Ickes, the archetypal landgrabber, whose namesake descendant is the Clintons' big fundraiser. Ickes' precedent set the stage for the likes of George Soros and the other billionaires funding the econut movement--Ted Turner is one that comes to mind, and there's one other guy whose name I'm trying to member, I believe a Canadian linked to Mikhail Gorbachev's "Green Cross" movement. Hollywood does indeed fuel the ideology underlying this. But where did Hollywood get it from? FDR's VP Henry Wallace had a guru named Nicholas Roerich. Al Gore's environmentalism reflected the influence of New Age gurus like John Alexander. Gotta figure Kennedy and Kerry have some similar "intellectual" guidance.

But back to Wilson and the Saudis. You hit upon a motive that makes sense: in order for the Saudis to keep the US dependent on OPEC, they have to stop the US from developing alternative sources of oil/energy, so it serves Saudi interests (not to mention Russian interests--relevant here is the Russian history of exploiting OPEC against the West and their current attempt to capitalize former Soviet oil reserves--Al Gore's Armand Hammer connection and its links to Clinton's Afghanistan policy=Bin Laden plays into this) to do things such as fund the environmental attack on Alaskan drilling, keep the US from access to Iraq's oil, spike the US economic recovery, and send Mr. Wilson to undermine Bush's policies, including incidentally his policy of taking steps towards an energy self-sufficient US.

All of which sheds some light, but the question remains: *who* sent Mr. Wilson? The NYT has been suggested as a suspect. Can we get more specific about that? For instance, does the NYT have a Saudi/ME affairs correspondent? Is there someone at the NYT who helped break the Wilson story, or has interviewed him since?