Sure, but I'm saying that there should be no such thing as a "marriage contract." Consenting adults should be free to enter into any contract that lays out their relationsip to one another, the terms under which the contract can be dissolved, how property is to be distributed upon dissolution etc. etc.
You could do that now, if you want to. However, keep in mind, if we allow government to define marriage, activist judges may very well end up forcing the country to accept gay marriage as equal to regular marriage. By eliminating marriage as something the government does, that risk goes away permanently.
If you see this as a good end, by all means, seek to enact such a system via legislation.
You could do that now, if you want to. However, keep in mind, if we allow government to define marriage, activist judges may very well end up forcing the country to accept gay marriage as equal to regular marriage.
At which time, it will become necessary to replenish the tree of liberty.
By eliminating marriage as something the government does, that risk goes away permanently.
This only would open a box to more social ills that would result in the end of this society. Sorry, but I'll have to oppose your plan as well as theirs.