You're smart enough to know how this works. At least I think you are. If you make a contention, the burden is on you to be able to prove it conclusively. Otherwise, you could send those who question you on endless wild goose chases trying to refute everything you throw out.
So, until you can back up what you post with some legitimate, objective citations, I'll continue to remain skeptical.
If you make a contention, the burden is on you to be able to prove it conclusively... So, until you can back up what you post with some legitimate, objective citations, I'll continue to remain skeptical.
In reply 174, I asked you:
Would you please tell me how you're qualified to make this undocumented statement? Do you have a PhD or MD in this field? Is it based on some research you've published?
If your statement, that doesn't change who they innately are, is based on published research, would you please cite the title of the article and the name of the peer reviewed journal in which it was published? Thanks.
You contend that homosexuality is innate. If you make a contention, the burden is on you to be able to prove it conclusively. So, until you can back up what you post with some legitimate, objective citations, I'll continue to remain skeptical.