That was uncalled for, don't you think?
Well, I didn't catch until his irrate response that it could be read to mean I was calling him a queer. Having been accused of it, I decided to follow suit with my later comment.
I meant to mean, he is always arguing as a gay advocate; therefore, if it talks like the enemy....it's probably the enemy. All persons pushing gay marriage are not queers, but I consider all of them my enemy (the analogy began on an earlier post). I am not interested in knowing his sex habits.
If I am wrong about Luis, then he can say. Is he or is he not for gay marriage? If he favors it, then he is arguing disingenuously.