Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Bikers4Bush
Unfortunately there are heterosexual unions that neither can nor will promote offspring either. There are those who by surgery or by nature who are no longer able to produce offspring. So this distinction falls short.

Sexual intercourse spreads disease. I'm sure you realize that diseases have been, are being, and will be spread by heterosexual intercourse.

128 posted on 02/13/2004 1:00:23 PM PST by HouTom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies ]


To: HouTom
By surgery is a choice, by nature is unfortunate. To compare the two to homosexual sex is at the least dishonest.

Heterosexual sex is not responsible for bringing and inflicting the black plague of our age on us. Beastiality and homosexual sex however are.
132 posted on 02/13/2004 1:05:44 PM PST by Bikers4Bush (Flood waters rising, heading for more conservative ground. Write in Tancredo in 04'!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies ]

To: HouTom
Sexual intercourse spreads disease. I'm sure you realize that diseases have been, are being, and will be spread by heterosexual intercourse.

Idealized, traditional heterosexuality told us that you were not to have sexual relations until you were married and then you were supposed to stay monogamous. If everyone followed these guidelines (I know most don't, but humor me) there would be virtually no sexually transmitted diseases in the heterosexual community.

The homosexual community has no such guidelines. They have no moral structure to their relationships. There are no rules saying you should remain pure until you find your same-sex life partner. There is no strong tradition encouraging gay couples to stay together for life. In fact one could point out that the gay culture encourages experimentation and open relationships. I recall a gay comedian talking about being broken up after his boyfriend of six months moved out. "That's the gay equivalent of a 50 year marriage for you breeders!"

Even my gay friends (I live in Fort Lauderdale and have LOTS of gay friends and acquaintances) say that gay marriage is not desired by most of their circle. A few would like the option, but even their comments of "how would you handle divorce" and "as soon as you do, you'll meet the man of your dreams" speak to looking at marriage as something that would be designed to be exited.

My main concern is that this will further water down an already beleaguered institution and cause it to become completely meaningless. I cannot imagine that being good for our society in the long term.

180 posted on 02/13/2004 1:51:07 PM PST by Crusher138 (Then conquer we must, when our cause it is just, and this be our motto "In God is our trust!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson