Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Polybius
Those marriages are not recognized by state law and are therefore not valid.

You must have missed this from the article:

The US city of San Francisco has become the first civil authority in the United States to officially marry gay couples in open defiance of laws banning the practice. The city, under the orders of new liberal Mayor Gavin Newsom, officially married at least 15 gay couples and issued marriage licences to around a dozen others.

64 posted on 02/13/2004 11:52:48 AM PST by Spiff (Have you committed a random act of thoughtcrime today?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies ]


To: Spiff
Those marriages are not recognized by state law and are therefore not valid.

You must have missed this from the article:...... The US city of San Francisco has become the first civil authority in the United States to officially marry gay couples in open defiance of laws banning the practice. The city, under the orders of new liberal Mayor Gavin Newsom, officially married at least 15 gay couples and issued marriage licences to around a dozen others.

Nope. I did did not miss that part.

It does not change what I said in the least.

Marriage have legal standing by "the powers invested in (the priest, rabbi, pastor, judge, etc.) by the State of (insert the name of one of the 50 States here)."

A marriage ceremony without the force of State law = A pretend marriage.

A mayor claiming such marriages are "official" = A politician blowing hot air.

The City of San Francisco's "official" marriages carry as much legal weight in a California court of law as my kid's pretend marriage between the pet dogs.

85 posted on 02/13/2004 12:56:24 PM PST by Polybius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson