To: Bikers4Bush
Did the medicare spending fiasco have anything to do with winning the war on terror, defending the homeland, or creating jobs? How about the leave no child behind spending abomination? The funding for the NEA?Yes, if the President is going to be in a position to take an uncompromising stand on things like the war on terror, tax cuts, judicial nominees, etc. he was going to have to compromise on other issues.
17 posted on
02/13/2004 10:22:47 AM PST by
Dolphy
To: Dolphy
BS, he hasn't truly pushed for any of his judicial nominees and he has a majority in both the house and senate.
None of those these were compromises. When you make something your own agenda it's no longer a compromise.
18 posted on
02/13/2004 10:35:19 AM PST by
Bikers4Bush
(Flood waters rising, heading for more conservative ground. Write in Tancredo in 04'!)
To: Dolphy
" he was going to have to compromise on other issues "
It is unfortunate when compromise replaces leadership.
20 posted on
02/13/2004 10:53:34 AM PST by
WhiteGuy
(Congress shall make no law... abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press...)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson