"So your objections are that for over 170 years the judiciary has been corrupt....and that case law and precedent, the basis of our legal system ....., is dangerous and should be removed - 'move the case law to the landfills."
In a nutshell, yes.
"A state can not decide to ignore parts that it doesn't like, nor can individuals. "
Your statement is meaningless under todays standards. The federal government can, and does ignore the constitution on a continuous basis,
I'll take it as point made that a state can not constitutionally issue legislation against the federal Constitution.
You have moved to a position that the state should break the Constitution since the Federal government has - another thread topic and something along the lines of it's ok to break the law because everyone is.
>> You have moved to a position that the state should break the Constitution since the Federal government has - another thread topic and something along the lines of it's ok to break the law because everyone is.
Nonsense. My position has consistently been that the government should abide by the Constitution. You are the one who thinks it is okay for them to break it if someone broke it in the past and got away with it (e.g., if it is supported by "CASE LAW" it is okay). Lawyers and judges are evil bast..ds.