[Doctor Stochastic]

Non-responsive. More tap-dancing. Subject changing.

You objected to a scientific theory claiming that such theory didn't presuppose divine intervention. The question was whether you rejected other scientific theories which also do not presuppose divine intervention.

VI=ON

[PhilipFreneau]

>> Non-responsive. More tap-dancing. Subject changing . . . You objected to a scientific theory claiming that such theory didn't presuppose divine intervention. The question was whether you rejected other scientific theories which also do not presuppose divine intervention.

You really don't understand, do you? I'll try one more time. The only theories (or laws) that require divine intervention, in one manner or another, are those that are contrary to the fulfillment of prophecy. Currently I can think of only one: evolution. Now if God told me that I would rise up in the air and fly like Superman, a few physical laws would require divine intervention. I have no doubt God could accomplish this, if he pleased. But I don't see it happening in any of the prophecy.