To: PhilipFreneau
Non-responsive. You are tap-dancing around your own statement. Try to pay attention.
You stated: "My problem with the theory, in general, is that is presupposes no divine intervention. "
If presupposition of divine intervention is your requirement for a theory, are you rejecting the other theories, gravitation, for example? If not, what is the criterion that a theory require divine intervention as opposed to others which do not?
508 posted on
02/18/2004 3:57:41 PM PST by
Doctor Stochastic
(Vegetabilisch = chaotisch is der Charakter der Modernen. - Friedrich Schlegel)
To: Doctor Stochastic
Well, as I said, if it addresses human origins, presupposing no divine intervention is not acceptable ;^)
510 posted on
02/18/2004 4:56:22 PM PST by
BMCDA
To: Doctor Stochastic
>> Non-responsive. You are tap-dancing around your own statement. Try to pay attention . . . If presupposition of divine intervention is your requirement for a theory, are you rejecting the other theories, gravitation, for example? If not, what is the criterion that a theory require divine intervention as opposed to others which do not?
What are you talking about? If you had read my posts you would know that I was referring to the fulfillment of prophecy. Is that really that hard for you to understand?
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson