[donh]

Does it not occur to you that you are defending a dead horse here? Is it your contention that "proof" means "Something we absolutely believe, but is subject to question?" Or do you wish to take the stand that scientific facts are not subject to question? This will come as quite good news to the proponents of the fixed continent theory, the phrenology theory, and the curative bleeding theory.

[Ophiucus]

Is it your contention that "proof" means "Something we absolutely believe, but is subject to question?"

No, I have simply taken the position that your definition of proof is to rigorous for practical science, and is that of the abstract.