[Aeon Flux]

Spunkie- The ban is presently being challenged by Federal judges across the nation, therefore, whether or not it is enforcable at this time is up in the air.

I think you are confused with the points Cyber and I are trying to make.

We are both questioning whether the AG is within his rights to bulldoze into medical records, over stepping federal medical records privacy laws, to enforce a law that the federal judges and their courts have not determined is enforceable as of yet.

To give a nod to the questionable infringement of civil rights on an issue that disturbs you, will lead to an open door on the infringement of the rights on issues that will hit you much closer to rights you will want to keep for yourself.

[spunkets]

"The ban is presently being challenged by Federal judges"

The fed law is not being challenged by judges. THe law is being challenged by planned parenthood and the docs that are a part of, and back them.

" I think you are confused with the points Cyber and I are trying to make."

I am not confused. Your points are either irrelevant, and or just flat wrong. Also Cyber isn't arguing anything here. "AG is within his rights to bulldoze into medical records"

He is not bulldozing into med records. The docs opened them up for viewing with their claims and testimony. There is no ID given with the records. What part of, "there is no privacy concern" don't you get?

"questionable infringement of civil rights"

The right involved here is the right to life. Their are no privacy rights involved. "will lead to an open door on the infringement of the rights"

This case has bearing on the right to life and whether the courts will restrain themselves to honoring the truth and uphold the law. That is it.