Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: sistergoldenhair
At least ONE person understands what I'm saying. I'm pro-life BUT I am not for the government digging into records for some 'righteous' cause.
16 posted on 02/12/2004 6:31:10 PM PST by cyborg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]


To: cyborg; MHGinTN
At least ONE person understands what I'm saying. I'm pro-life BUT I am not for the government digging into records for some 'righteous' cause.

A baby died. The "righteous" must now administer Justice. Jeesh.

18 posted on 02/12/2004 6:33:20 PM PST by I got the rope
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: cyborg
government digging into records for some 'righteous' cause.

The camel's nose...

19 posted on 02/12/2004 6:34:15 PM PST by sistergoldenhair
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: cyborg
The doctor who signed the affidavit saying the procedure was medically necessary put his own practice at issue. He can't testify like that without having the facts to back it up, and it is a miscarriage of justice to deny the Government the opportunity to prove him a liar. If he wants to withdraw the affidavit, and protect his patients from the unlikely event that someone could deduce their names from the medical history, so be it.
20 posted on 02/12/2004 6:34:15 PM PST by Iconoclast2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: cyborg
These are records of criminal activity (murder). The people who hired for the murders aren't even going to be revealed, so there's no so-called "privacy" issue.
81 posted on 02/12/2004 9:36:46 PM PST by Republican Wildcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson