To: sistergoldenhair
At least ONE person understands what I'm saying. I'm pro-life BUT I am not for the government digging into records for some 'righteous' cause.
16 posted on
02/12/2004 6:31:10 PM PST by
cyborg
To: cyborg; MHGinTN
At least ONE person understands what I'm saying. I'm pro-life BUT I am not for the government digging into records for some 'righteous' cause. A baby died. The "righteous" must now administer Justice. Jeesh.
To: cyborg
government digging into records for some 'righteous' cause.The camel's nose...
To: cyborg
The doctor who signed the affidavit saying the procedure was medically necessary put his own practice at issue. He can't testify like that without having the facts to back it up, and it is a miscarriage of justice to deny the Government the opportunity to prove him a liar. If he wants to withdraw the affidavit, and protect his patients from the unlikely event that someone could deduce their names from the medical history, so be it.
To: cyborg
These are records of criminal activity (murder). The people who hired for the murders aren't even going to be revealed, so there's no so-called "privacy" issue.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson