Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

FAKE "2nd photo" of Kerry-Fonda at rally
Vanity | Feb. 11, 2002 | Self

Posted on 02/12/2004 2:47:30 PM PST by Madstrider

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 301-320321-340341-360361-375 next last
To: Hon
"Sue me."

If you were as important as you seem to think you are you might be fair game, but I'll probably continue with my own life by doing big things and letting others pretend.
321 posted on 02/15/2004 4:06:41 PM PST by billhilly (If you're lurking here from DU, I trust this post will make you sick)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 317 | View Replies]

To: Hon
"I think it is counterproductive."
In some ways, yes, in others not.
"When people see the real photos [...] they will say--oh, it's just another fake."
I believe that the image won't be as viewed as much as people will believe that the Kerry-Fonda link is real..which it is...and that he spoke at a rally with her...which he did.

That's it? That's all?

You say its counterproductive, he says yes and no.
You say people will say its a fake, he says the Kerry-Fonda link is real.

That's it?

That's a bit much to blame a conspiracy on, don'cha think?

Opps. Forget I asked that. Don't bother answering this -- I wouldn't want to take up any more of your valuable time.

322 posted on 02/15/2004 4:07:35 PM PST by reformed_democrat (We have to get credit before we can be discredited!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 312 | View Replies]

To: billhilly
Good for you!
323 posted on 02/15/2004 4:08:09 PM PST by Hon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 321 | View Replies]

To: Hon; Admin Moderator; Lead Moderator; Jim Robinson
I'm not talking about your judgment on posting that FReepmail. I'm talking about copyrights, lawsuits, and so on. If you publically post an email like that it can become evidence if things are going to go legal. This has become big enough that someone is going to smell money and decide to go after some.

You are worried about damage to the site--so am I. What you did might exacerbate this. I'm no lawyer, but I'm guessing that maybe this thread could damage the site far more than Registered's photo.
324 posted on 02/15/2004 4:08:44 PM PST by Triple Word Score
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 320 | View Replies]

To: Hon
Did you play the Black Knight in Monty Python and The Holy Grail?

No. Why do you ask? I thought you had better things to do than banter with me.

Or is General Turnipseed not answering his phone these days?

325 posted on 02/15/2004 4:11:30 PM PST by reformed_democrat (We have to get credit before we can be discredited!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 318 | View Replies]

To: Triple Word Score
"I'm not talking about your judgment on posting that FReepmail. I'm talking about copyrights, lawsuits, and so on. If you publically post an email like that it can become evidence if things are going to go legal. This has become big enough that someone is going to smell money and decide to go after some."

You don't have a clue as to what you are talking about. Anything sent to me, a letter, an email, any similar communication, becomes my property. I can do what I want with it.

You can look it up.
326 posted on 02/15/2004 4:16:51 PM PST by Hon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 324 | View Replies]

To: billhilly
This was no typical Registered photo parody. His behavior was odd too. After questions came up about the photo, which was presented as a scanned portion of newspaper, Registered said he didn't know if it was real and implied that he got it via email. Then he changed the photo to which his post pointed. Later, someone found another copy of the photo on Registered's site and it started to get posted everywhere. Once it was demonstrated that the newspaper clipping was fake the Admin Moderators started pouncing on them and deleting posts containing the fake photo and then Registered changed that photo file to another pic. Mind you, this took place over several hours with many people trying to get Registered to actually respond.

Registered then sent me a FReepmail about it in which it was clear to me that it was an intentional hoax. (He doesn't like it called that, but that is what it was.) He also replied to one of my replies and later pinged me to a comment in a thread which further demonstrated why he did it.

327 posted on 02/15/2004 4:17:17 PM PST by Spiff (Don't believe everything you think.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 313 | View Replies]

To: reformed_democrat
Thanks for exposing your real agenda--which is to troll.
328 posted on 02/15/2004 4:17:28 PM PST by Hon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 325 | View Replies]

To: reformed_democrat
Looks like it is time for the adults to leave. We all know who we are.
329 posted on 02/15/2004 4:17:43 PM PST by billhilly (If you're lurking here from DU, I trust this post will make you sick)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 322 | View Replies]

To: billhilly
So sayeth the man who has "FU is not just a university in Florida" on his profile page.
330 posted on 02/15/2004 4:19:18 PM PST by Hon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 329 | View Replies]

To: reformed_democrat
That's it? That's all?

Why the sudden interest in this? And why are you trying to pick a fight with people about this?

331 posted on 02/15/2004 4:19:32 PM PST by Spiff (Don't believe everything you think.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 322 | View Replies]

To: Hon; Registered; Jim Robinson
I'm not telling you what you can and can't do with the FReepmail. I'm telling you what you did is dishonorable to Registered and to Jim Robinson--who is, after all, the only one who really has a right to an opinion of who has damaged his site.

You think JR is wrong and you put up evidence you say proves him wrong--but you didn't provide it to HIM first.
332 posted on 02/15/2004 4:21:30 PM PST by Triple Word Score
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 326 | View Replies]

To: Triple Word Score
"I'm not telling you what you can and can't do with the FReepmail. I'm telling you what you did is dishonorable to Registered and to Jim Robinson--who is, after all, the only one who really has a right to an opinion of who has damaged his site.

You think JR is wrong and you put up evidence you say proves him wrong--but you didn't provide it to HIM first."

Are you sure you're not Registered's mom?

Look, I had no idea that Jim Robinson had pronounced on the issue and that consequently all further commentary should first be run by him. Thank you for pointing that out.

I was under the impression that the moderators here worked with Mr. Robinson, to remove misinformation. And that is why they removed Registered's photoshopped photos--even after they were reposted again and again.

Spiff asked a good question above, which I doubt either Reformed Democrat or you will answer. But what is all of this to you? Registered did something wrong. He seems to have done it with his eyes wide open. Neither I nor Spiff or anybody else who is pointing it out are to blame for that.

Get a grip.
333 posted on 02/15/2004 4:28:30 PM PST by Hon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 332 | View Replies]

To: Hon
I'd be proud to be Registered's mom. He's extremely talented, and contributes a lot to the site, to conservatism, and therefore, to my country.

If he made an error in judgment, so be it; I believe it was well-intentioned. And it was FUNNY. It was FUNNY because it had the RING OF TRUTH. As Dave Barry says,

"Yes, I have made mistakes. But who has not? Are you perfect? Can you look yourself in the eye and honestly say: ''I have never, while high on crack, driven a bank-robbery getaway car into an elementary school?'"
334 posted on 02/15/2004 4:35:11 PM PST by Triple Word Score
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 333 | View Replies]

To: Triple Word Score
I offered to Jim Robinson to send the FReepmails from Registered. He did not respond.
335 posted on 02/15/2004 4:38:53 PM PST by Spiff (Don't believe everything you think.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 332 | View Replies]

To: Spiff
Then that should have told you something about whether this was worth continuing to fight on multiple threads.

Registered may have made a mistake of unusual proportions. He's not our enemy.
336 posted on 02/15/2004 4:40:47 PM PST by Triple Word Score
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 335 | View Replies]

To: Triple Word Score
He's extremely talented, and contributes a lot to the site, to conservatism, and therefore, to my country.

I agree. I love most of his stuff and consider him an asset. However, there is more to this specific fake photo incident than you are aware of.

337 posted on 02/15/2004 4:42:09 PM PST by Spiff (Don't believe everything you think.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 334 | View Replies]

To: Triple Word Score
Well, then slip him a tip for goodness sake. We know he's not here for his health:

Registered's Tip Glass

 

http://www.freerepublic.com/~registered/

(Too bad about the real Fonda/Kerry photo and story getting diverted. But it's no big deal. As long as some of us got some laughs.)

338 posted on 02/15/2004 4:44:51 PM PST by Hon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 334 | View Replies]

To: Triple Word Score
Registered may have made a mistake of unusual proportions. He's not our enemy.

I agree. I never said he was the enemy. I just said he demonstrated poor judgement and may want to apologize for the problems his stunt caused.

339 posted on 02/15/2004 4:44:56 PM PST by Spiff (Don't believe everything you think.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 336 | View Replies]

To: Hon; Triple Word Score; Jim Robinson; Registered; Howlin
In the time you've been a member here, Hon, you have established yourself as a hard-working person, and have posted some very substantive, interesting threads.

Registered has a long history at FR; he has made many, many satiric photos; I understand why Jim Robinson would give him the benefit of the doubt.

Now, as we saw on Fox News Sunday, news of the fake picture--posted "on the Internet", according to Chris Wallace--is out there. Chris WAllace poo-poohed it as coming from the INternet, as if the Internet means it's fake.

That's not true... stuff is not necessarily fake, but it is oftentimes true and certainly fresh. However, obviously, information coming from the INternet needs to be checked out. Apparently Newsmax didn't do that.

You know, if NewsMax has people surfing/lurking on FR to get information, it seems to me that organization should "get to know" FR enough that they would know that Registered's specialty is parody; his own website is full of pardody. Otherwise they shouldn't post it as "news." It's Newsmax's fault... Like Howlin said, NM didn't give credit.

You know... FR is like a meeting in a coffee shop. People come and gossip and trade jokes... But a good reporter won't just run with some piece of gossip they hear in a coffee shop... that reporter will back it up.

The fault lies with Newsmax--or any other "news" organization that presents itself as disseminating the truth to the public--not with Registered.

And thanks to the Freepers that did Newsmax's work for it/them by letting them know it wasn't a real picture.
340 posted on 02/15/2004 4:46:19 PM PST by proud American in Canada (Take back the First Amendment! Call today! U.S. Capitol Switchboard (202) 224-3121)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 333 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 301-320321-340341-360361-375 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson