FAKE "2nd photo" of Kerry-Fonda at rally

Vanity | Feb. 11, 2002 | Self

[billhilly]

The looney left is easily matched by the rigid right.

[Triple Word Score]

Now that is one line *I* am stealing. :-)

[reformed_democrat]

The looney left is easily matched by the rigid right.

Tell me about it!

The Republicans here let a Parental Notification bill fail because it wasn't pure enough for them. We now have the Hope Clinic, to which teachers can bring students for abortions without any notice to parents whatsoever. When a mom found out where her daughter was going, she went to the clinic, but was kept away by the police.

There was a really sad story about that posted here a year ago. I still can't believe how good these guys are at throwing out the baby with the bathwater.

[Hon]

"I wasn't aware that Registered planned to deliberately mislead the people here. Also, what was he hoping to accomplish?

Please explain how you know this."

Man you are a pest. He TOLD me as much, in personal messages--such as this one, which is a comment on something I had posted publicly:

"There is a faked photo by Registered which is succeeding in wasting a lot of time and confusing a lot of people."

It does other things too. Think about it. --[Registered]

+++++++

Now go waste somebody else's time.

[Incorrigible]

Yeah! What you said!

[Hon]

"Journalists don't have an obligation to be sure of what they're printing? To secure permission to print the intellectual property of others? You don't think that Newsmax is more responsible for this than Registered?"

Are you his mom? The photo purported to be from the AP. Newsmax probably has a general license with AP to use whatever they want.

Get over it. Registered screwed up big time and he hurt this site and the Fonda Kerry story. Live with it.

[reformed_democrat]

I asked you a simple question. You could give me the courtesy of a simple reply.

You're accusing someone of something that, frankly, could cause problems for him. I'm asking you to prove that what you're saying is true.

If it is, please provide a link, or state the title of the thread, in which

He TOLD me as much, in personal messages--such as this one, which is a comment on something I had posted publicly:

"There is a faked photo by Registered which is succeeding in wasting a lot of time and confusing a lot of people."

You might consider this a waste of time. I don't. I do not like to see people falsely accused.

If you find that "pesty," so be it. But if you're going to sling mud, you'd best be careful not to get any on yourself.

[Triple Word Score]

Go look at Jim Robinson's own words on this and consider who has the right to pass judgment on Registered.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1076946/posts?page=68#68

[billhilly]

"You could give me the courtesy of a simple reply."

From what I have observed here, a simple reply is the best that you can expect. Even that may pose a problem.

[Spiff]

I have FReepmail from Registered in which he implies that the fake photo was an intentional hoax. Apparently, Hon has similar FReepmail.

[Spiff]

Go look at Jim Robinson's own words on this and consider who has the right to pass judgment on Registered.

Jim didn't have all the information. I too hoped that Registered wouldn't engage in an intentional hoax.

[billhilly]

Intentional hoaxes have been a staple of FR for almost a decade. Some people who post here have senses of humor. Registered has posted hundreds of photos with the intention of having Freepers caption them. In fact, there used to be an award for best caption. I once won it.

Not everyone here needs to be lectured to by self important keepers of the "real truth."

[Triple Word Score]

Then don't you think you should have provided that information to the site owner, instead of just gossipping about it (PRIVATE EMAIL) in public???

[reformed_democrat]

I have FReepmail from Registered

So, lets see it. Copy and paste is easy.

Then we can ask Jim Robinson to verify this with Registered. If the evidence is as damning as you and Hon say, we'll all be able to see for ourselves what sort of person Registered is.

[billhilly]

At the bottom of this post is a category called private reply. Obviously that means nothing to you when it comes to someone else's privacy, and you bellyache about the actions of others.

I certainly don't thing hon reflects the first three letters of honorable.

[Hon]

Sue me.

[Hon]

Did you play the Black Knight in Monty Python and The Holy Grail?

[Triple Word Score]

Um, in case Jim Robinson has something else to do besides babysit FR right now, I'm thinking that maybe somebody ought to jump in here with an official word or two--even if there are no legal ramifications to FR to consider.

[Hon]

"Um, in case Jim Robinson has something else to do besides babysit FR right now, I'm thinking that maybe somebody ought to jump in here with an official word or two--even if there are no legal ramifications to FR to consider."

Get a grip. There are no legal ramifications even if it were email. As it was, it was an UNSOLICITED communication from Registered to me.

You and others were accusing me and Spiff of being liars. I proved what I was saying, and now you call foul. Go jump in a lake.