To: Quilla
I wondered the same thing. Possible answer: Drudge is more willing to run with a story, without much corraboration. CNN, whatever it is, isn't willing to run a story, particularly one that was phoned-in by an anonymous Clinton person. With Drudge as the source, the Clintons are better able to hide the tracks leading back to them. Plus, the Clintons get their jollies out of being able to do their dirty work through Drudge, who first started the Lewinsky story.
65 posted on
02/12/2004 1:21:59 PM PST by
My2Cents
("Well...there you go again.")
To: My2Cents
I drove home for lunch. I did not hear this story mentioned at the top of the hour radio news and once home I didn't hear a mention on MSNBC, CNN, ABC, Fox, etc.......
BTW, my main curiosity is to see how Teresa will handle this. That may be the big story.
76 posted on
02/12/2004 1:26:03 PM PST by
umgud
(speaking strictly as an infidel,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,)
To: My2Cents
"who first started the Lewinsky story." No, he first broke the story because Isikoff and Newsweek didn't have the b*lls to go with what they had, even though it was solid.
289 posted on
02/12/2004 3:03:52 PM PST by
sweetliberty
(To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it.")
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson