Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: BurbankKarl
If homosexual marriage passes, remember, NAMBLA members can marry and legally adopt their boy sex toys. They can adopt lots of them, and share them with each other. The Texas Sodomy law would stop any investigations. The homosexuals will be allowed to freely molest their victims at will.
36 posted on 02/12/2004 1:07:01 PM PST by concerned about politics ( Liberals are still stuck at the bottom of Maslow's Hierarchy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: concerned about politics
"If homosexual marriage passes, remember, NAMBLA members can marry and legally adopt their boy sex toys."

As opposed to now, when they can adopt without marrying?
87 posted on 02/12/2004 3:42:20 PM PST by Kahonek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies ]

To: concerned about politics
The point people seem to be missing in the entire debate is that homosexuals are NOT discriminated against. They can get married just like everyone else. Just not to each other.

The issue is same sex marriage which is illegal. That is the law and if you don't like it, then by all means repeal it. Attempting to bypass the law by claiming that your crusade is a "rights issue" is nonsense. This has nothing to do with your persona, it has to do with your behaviour.

"Behaviour" as in a person who uses drugs. They have a choice to make and even the arguement that they have an "addictive personality" or are genetically predisposed to be a drug user won't save them from companies that screen their employees for drugs and then deny them a job because of their "behaviour". Is it right? Perhaps not. But, because it is not a "rights issue", it needs to be addressed through our legistlative process and not through an "activist court". The same with homosexuality and "gay marriage".

A "rights issue" is different. It is something that you have no control over. Age, ethnicity, race and gender would be considered a legitimate "rights issue".

A legitimate violation of someone's right's might therefore might be "age discrimination" and yet I not seen it addressed. At 18 years old I can give my life for my country fighting in Iraq but when I come home I can't have a beer because the drinking age is 21. That is discrimination.

116 posted on 02/13/2004 8:27:19 PM PST by expatguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson