To: rintense
The Clintons care only about themselves. Unless Kerry invites HRC to be his VP, the Clintons want Kerry to lose so Hillary can run in 2008. If Kerry wins in 2004, HRC can't run for the Presidency until 2012, at which point she'll be 65 years old. The CLintons backed Wesley Clark in the first place because they knew this weirdo would fail. There's every reason to believe that Clark made these remarks about Kerry and the intern with full (backstage) approval from the CLintons. Yes, this country's sexual morals are in the toilet. However, the response to Janet Jackson at the SUper Bowl is indicative of a growing backlash against sleaze. This backlash, coupled with possible sabotage from Kerry's wife if this story breaks, will lead to Kerry's meltdown. And Kerry's meltdown would position HRC to run in 2008.
96 posted on
02/12/2004 9:40:43 AM PST by
utahagen
To: utahagen
Rush expounding on the Clintons and how they are instrumental in bringing Kerry down......Clintons are the face of the Democrat party.....Clintons have the power...Rush states Kerry race is OVER and Hillary endorsed Edwards (who, by the way, is an out and out socialist...my words)....DON'T TRUST HILLARY, FOLKS!!
97 posted on
02/12/2004 9:42:51 AM PST by
smiley
To: utahagen
Two shrewd prognosticators:
1. President Bush to Russert - "He's not their nominee yet."
2. Freepers - For calling him John F'ing Kerry.
98 posted on
02/12/2004 9:43:53 AM PST by
Williams
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson