[VadeRetro]

You obviously are of the school darwin cult and uninterested in new science.

I'm completely familiar with discredited Behe-ite claims of "irreducible complexity," which is just the old chestnut about the eye moved down to the cellular level. I'm uninterested because there's nothing to learn there.

ID will never have anything to teach us. It's based upon the principle of "When you get to a mystery, stop! Publish! You're done." You don't learn anything that way.

[metacognative]

You're "when you get to a mystery, stop" cliched reference to ID is a lot of crap and you should know it. More like; if the evidence is overwhelming, consider it.