Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Advance Notice: Bush and the Stock Market Can Take the Hits
National Review Online ^ | 2/11/04 | Lawrence Kudlow

Posted on 02/12/2004 5:54:36 AM PST by WarrenC

President Bush’s bounce from the capture of Saddam Hussein has faded. His State of the Union message had clear vision but it lacked enough rhetorical punch to deliver another bounce. And now the president is taking political hits from all angles, temporarily slowing the stock market advance.

Sen. John Kerry, on the other hand, is getting a large bounce from his primary victories, with Bush-bashing on the Democratic campaign trail nearing a fever pitch. Heavy coverage by the print and broadcast media is only fuelling the charge of the anti-Bush forces.

Missing WMDs haven’t helped Bush either. Nor has lower-than-expected job growth — although continuing gains in the Labor Department’s household survey, showing more self-employed and private-contract workers, is still the dirty little secret. (Just watch: Significant job gains are coming.) Big budget deficits are also grabbing the headlines, even though they are vastly overrated in both numerical and economic terms.

What all this says is that the stock market rally has come under some political pressure. Bush is the pro-investor candidate, but his fortunes have momentarily slumped. Kerry is the enemy of the investor class, and the new Democratic class-warfare hero, but his veneer has only temporarily brightened. Stocks, of course, respond to all these factors, passing though they may be.

Time for investors to worry? Not at all. Liberal Yale economist Ray Fair has a better idea. His economic model projecting the presidential popular vote is strongly favoring Bush (although the rigorously honest Prof. Fair would have it otherwise). With a 2004 growth economy near 4 percent, low inflation, and a rising jobs number, Fair’s model predicts a Bush landslide with 58 percent of the popular vote.

Additional uncertainty is coming from both the G-7 finance ministers and Federal Reserve chairman Alan Greenspan — who is to give congressional testimony today. But there’s still no reason for market skittishness.

The G-7 ministers, a.k.a. the currency mavens, have changed their tune of late. Last September in Doha, Dubai, they called for “more flexibility” in currency exchange rates. Over the weekend in Boca Raton, Florida, they criticized “excess volatility and disorderly movements.”

No one knows exactly what this means, but chances are Europe will be buying dollars and selling euros. They will also reduce their policy interest-rate target and create faster money-supply growth to lower the euro currency value.

Which brings us to Greenspan before Congress. He is likely to hint today that a slight rise in the fed funds policy interest rate is in the offing, especially because of strong economic growth and a more solid labor market than payroll job reports have indicated.

The combination of a firmer dollar and a minor Fed rate hike suggests that U.S. monetary policy will become ever-so-slightly less accommodative. For quite some time, interest-rate futures markets have been predicting a Fed hike of one-quarter of one percent in either June or August of this year. Currency futures markets suggest a slightly lower euro.

Forward-looking stock market sectors are beginning to discount these mild changes in the economic outlook. That translates to a little less emphasis on growth-leveraged sectors (tech, telecom, materials, industrials, and consumer cyclicals) and a bit more emphasis on slower-growing value sectors (consumer staples, healthcare, and energy).

But a minor rise in U.S. interest rates and a steadier dollar that would slow down gold prices would be a good thing, not a bad one, and would certainly not reduce the bullish outlook for stock markets or the economy. Economist Arthur Laffer is now emphasizing the steeply upward-sloping Treasury yield curve as well as upward revisions to IRS-based corporate-profits measures as two incredibly bullish signals for rising stocks and the economy.

After-tax corporate profits have risen to 8 percent of gross domestic product. According to Laffer, that’s the highest ratio since all the way back in 1960. Even if these profits are capitalized with a 4½ or 5 percent 10-year Treasury, the stock market is still cheap.

A 5 percent 10-year Treasury yield inverts to the equivalent of a 20-times price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio. At 17½ times 2004 earnings, the S&P 500 would therefore be 15 percent undervalued. This gets us to over 1,300 on the S&P and above 12,000 on the Dow.

Obviously a lower Treasury rate translates to even higher prices on the major stock indexes. If the bond bears are too bearish, then the stock bulls can be even more bullish.

So have no fear. President Bush is taking some hits. But the stock market advance is far from over. Very far from over.

— Larry Kudlow, NRO's Economics Editor, is CEO of Kudlow & Co. and host with Jim Cramer of CNBC's Kudlow & Cramer.


TOPICS: Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: economic; fair; growth; kudlow; market; model; stock
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-40 next last
It seems to me I hear about this professor's economic model every election year, but I don't know what his record for accuracy is. Sure hope he's right.
1 posted on 02/12/2004 5:54:37 AM PST by WarrenC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: WarrenC
Admin Moderator --- It appears the correct title for this piece is "Advance Notice". Could you edit it for me? Thanks.
2 posted on 02/12/2004 5:56:05 AM PST by WarrenC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WarrenC
Go Larry, Go
3 posted on 02/12/2004 6:01:19 AM PST by The Wizard (Democrats are treasonous)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #4 Removed by Moderator

To: Rhys Ifans
2004 growth economy near 4 percent, low inflation, and a rising jobs number

The state tax revenues say that ain't happening. The inflation numbers are so cooked they're nuclear, and the jobs numbers are anyone's fancy. The state revenues are hard numbers -- and so the fuel price. We've had such no inflation, eh? Then why are fuel oil and gasoline up 50% from two years ago?

5 posted on 02/12/2004 6:07:52 AM PST by bvw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: bvw
Kudlow is also on record predicting a Dow 12,000 next year.
Hope so. He's my favorite Wall Street pundit.
6 posted on 02/12/2004 6:10:45 AM PST by Galtoid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Galtoid
Okay -- I'll make a ballpark -- the DOW could go to 23,000 next year. This is totally an effect of fiat money in hyper drive, dear. Where can that fiat moeny go? Into stocks, my good bro.

It says zero (maybe less) for jobs, and worse for economic health.

7 posted on 02/12/2004 6:24:43 AM PST by bvw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: WarrenC
Kudlow rules!
8 posted on 02/12/2004 6:37:29 AM PST by petercooper ("daisy-cutters trump a wiretap anytime" - Nicole Gelinas, 02-10-04)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #9 Removed by Moderator

To: bvw
Lessee, I buy gas at about $1.60 per gal. Exclude taxes, it's $1.04. If you adjust for non-fuel inflation, gas is cheaper now than in 1969 when I bought it for my Camaro.
10 posted on 02/12/2004 6:39:56 AM PST by LS (CNN is the Amtrack of news.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

Comment #11 Removed by Moderator

To: bvw
Nope. We're getting an increasing number of indicators that many of the "jobs" that once were counted by industries still exist as private firms. I've seen two separate reports that suggest that the number of unemployed is significantly overstated, and that the number of self-employed people (who make good incomes) is significantly understated.

And much of this is PRECISELY related to the Dow, because these people make stuff/provide services that are "outsourced" quietly inside America, but because it's not a big plant opening, no one sees it.

12 posted on 02/12/2004 6:42:03 AM PST by LS (CNN is the Amtrack of news.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Rhys Ifans
Hope, hope one way or hope the other is something not included in my observations.

Logically, then, the strong sense you seem to have of it is your own colorations.

13 posted on 02/12/2004 6:43:45 AM PST by bvw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: bvw
36,000 Dow !
14 posted on 02/12/2004 6:44:48 AM PST by Eric in the Ozarks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: bvw
What percentage is fuel of the COL? There are a lot of things involved. It's hard to believe someone as naive as you can use the internet.
15 posted on 02/12/2004 6:45:11 AM PST by BillM
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: bvw
The state tax revenues say that ain't happening. The inflation numbers are so cooked they're nuclear, and the jobs numbers are anyone's fancy. The state revenues are hard numbers -- and so the fuel price. We've had such no inflation, eh? Then why are fuel oil and gasoline up 50% from two years ago?

Actually fuel oil is less expensive than the fall of 2000. BTW, you can thank your buddies the demos for holding up drilling in ANWR.

The price of food and other things have been steady, but you ignore that.

Oh that's correct you are TLB rubber room fanatic, no wonder your demo talking points.

16 posted on 02/12/2004 6:45:39 AM PST by Dane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: LS
Well considering you're only then I guess you are r-i-i-ight.
17 posted on 02/12/2004 6:48:10 AM PST by bvw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: WarrenC

John Kerry is deeply saddened.

18 posted on 02/12/2004 6:48:15 AM PST by SamAdams76 (I got my 401(k) statement - Up 28.02% in 2003 - Thanks to tax cuts and the Bush recovery)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Eric in the Ozarks
Okay, I raise my estimate: DOW 40,000! Might as well have a toal blow out of the fiat money express!
19 posted on 02/12/2004 6:49:44 AM PST by bvw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

Comment #20 Removed by Moderator


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-40 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson