Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: lentulusgracchus
Pharmboy:
But they could have melted and recast the lead.

Assuming they got it all back......how likely is that?

Quite likely. The lead they used was fairly soft, and held together well at the low velocities.

Moreso if they used copper balls, like the Mexicans did,

Mexicans of the day commonly used copper? First I heard of this one.. Copper was more plentiful than lead down there?

much less so if they used lead. That ball would have had to strike nothing but soft tissue on every hit, not to have been badly deformed and fragmented. Occam's razor.

The 'razor' of soft lead & fairly low MV's would make it rather easy to recover bullets.. Even ones that struck bone.

But 40 times? Granted, the bull was probably being slung, & more than a bit..

31 posted on 02/12/2004 3:56:11 PM PST by tpaine (I'm trying to be 'Mr Nice Guy', but the U.S. Constitution defines conservatism; - not the GOP. .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]


To: tpaine
Mexicans of the day commonly used copper? First I heard of this one..

Yes. They used copper balls in their smoothbore muskets during the 1836 campaign. I don't know why, but their use of copper for bullet material is documented. It would have accelerated to higher MV's, but given the poor accuracy of smoothbores, I don't know what the advantage would have been.

39 posted on 02/14/2004 2:23:07 AM PST by lentulusgracchus (Et praeterea caeterum censeo, delenda est Carthago. -- M. Porcius Cato)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson