Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DaughterOfAnIwoJimaVet
To me, speaking as a male, Bush projects many endearing qualities, from his love of Christ (and he's not ashamed to admit it even to a liberal like Russert) to his occasional stumble. He's showing he's only human, unlike the Clinton worshippers who thought their man was omnipotent.
144 posted on 02/11/2004 11:24:18 PM PST by BigSkyFreeper (The South isn't Bush's backyard; The South is Bush's front yard)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 140 | View Replies ]


To: BigSkyFreeper
Agreed. He's not a narcissist like Clinton or Kerry - he doesn't think it's all about him. Well, you know - the pundits may not be impressed, but a lot of us love that about him.
150 posted on 02/11/2004 11:33:27 PM PST by DaughterOfAnIwoJimaVet ("Lashing out" at Democrats since 1990.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 144 | View Replies ]

To: BigSkyFreeper; Miss Marple
I agree with you, but I would change what you said in one way: Clinton's folks and fans did not think he was "omnipotent"; rather, I think what they thought about him was that he was COOL.

This questionable quality replaces power in their eyes. Exercising power would be too suspect in terms of coolness. This is why they were quite happy with his ineffectual tenure in office, and wished it could go on forever, in neverland, a suspension of the real world as the market went up and nothing happened--or so they continually told themselves.

I actually believe that Clinton's response to 9/11 WTC would have not been retaliation, but a way to show that he was still cool. The model would have been the Oklahoma Federal Building bombing--which more than anything saved him from being a one termer. He showed he was cool and the Gingrich and Limbaughs were not. All BS of course, but that's how it went. WJC would have said his menacing "we will hunt you down" one more time, but it would have been the supposed criminal facilitators of the twin towers and not the axis of evil that he would have been after. There never would have been an invasion of Afghanistan, let alone Iraq. We forget so easily, but the NPR types were not on board with going after the Taliban, in a land that supposedly eats up western powers. That's all forgotten now. That Bush actually had opposition [albeit muted in the immediate post 9/11 atmosphere] to that move. But this should be brought back to memory now by paid pundits like Peggy ---instead of her "inside Media" and "inside Politics" columns.

197 posted on 02/12/2004 5:40:24 AM PST by ontos-on
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 144 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson